The use of the steam engine as a propellant had been established in
the mercantile marine long before the British Admiralty led the way in
the adoption of the steamship as an engine of war. There were several
reasons why the decision to take the important step was not reached
earlier. In the first place there was a repugnance, amounting with many
persons to an unconquerable aversion, against the use of the steamship
for any purposes whatever. Steamships were regarded as unsightly with
their splashing paddle-wheels and their high funnels belching forth
smoke, and as the steam mercantile marine had been by no means free
from boiler explosions and had lost many vessels through fires caused
by sparks or cinders from the furnaces, or the overheating of wood work
near the flues, it was argued that the introduction of so many fresh
dangers into the country’s fighting ships would only add to the perils
of the sea, which were already serious and numerous enough.
The navy possessed many fine wooden ships which could be handled
extremely smartly under sail and presented a magnificent contrast and
beautiful picture compared with the smoky steamer. The latter, it
was graciously admitted, might have its uses in towing the sailing
warships, but that anything further should be advocated was too
subversive of all that had gone before; too revolutionary, indeed, to
merit a moment’s consideration.
It was in vain that the advocates of the adoption of steam propulsion
urged that the steamship could carry guns, that she would be
independent of wind and tide, and that she could choose her own
position. These strategical advantages were simply derided. What, it
was asked in reply, could a small steamship armed with such guns as
she could carry, do against a battleship; or, for that matter, what
could any number of armed steamships do? When it was pointed out that
an armed steamship could engage with every advantage an enemy’s ship of
the same size, the retort was that a battleship would never be far off.
Strange though these objections seem to us in the light of subsequent
events, it must be recollected that marine steam engines in those days
were bulky for their power and weak for their weight, and consumed an
enormous amount of coal for the energy developed, and that there was no
room to spare in the fighting ships of the period; also, that the steam
engine was not far removed from the experimental stage. For the first
twenty-five years of the nineteenth century the Admiralty had every
excuse for the maintenance of its conservative attitude.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account