The naval operations before Sebastopol and Cronstadt proved by no means
satisfactory to the attacking vessels. The latter were not weak as
fighting ships, for they constituted the most powerful line-of-battle
ships ever constructed up to that period, and nearly all of them were
screw-propelled. The principal guns in the Russian forts were heavier
than any carried afloat by the allies, and not only fired a heavier
and more penetrating shot, but shell also--this being the first war in
which modern explosive shells were used--and had an effective range far
in excess of that of the ships’ guns.
The great three-deckers which assailed the fortifications of Sebastopol
and Cronstadt were prevented by the shallowness of the water from
getting near enough to inflict serious damage irrespective of what
they might themselves sustain, a course which was certainly urged, if
channels could be found, especially by some strategists who, being
at home, would not be exposed to the danger, and ignored the fact
that the ships, if stranded, could be shelled at leisure. In the
fleets’ attack upon Sebastopol the sailing warships were provided with
attendant steamers lashed alongside to render them assistance when
their positions had to be changed. But the range at which, for the most
part, the allies’ warships had to operate rendered them comparatively
ineffective, and when Kinburn, like Cronstadt, proved a tougher
nut to crack--a characteristic it shared with many of the Russian
defences--than the allies expected, the English and French could do
nothing but blockade the places and adopt other means of reducing the
fortresses than by bombarding them from their big wooden battleships.
Two fresh problems had thus been created for solution. The first and
most pressing was to provide the type of ship best fitted to cope with
the Russian batteries. Hitherto, engagements between fortresses and
battleships had been fairly equal because the guns employed by one side
would be much the same as those of the other, while the ships had the
further advantages of being able to shift their positions as suited
them best, and to concentrate the fire of their broadsides wherever
necessary. The majority of shore and battery engagements ended in
victories for the ships.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account