After the feverish activity of the war came a period of comparative
inaction. The whole political atmosphere of the world, however, was
too heavily charged--too electric, as it were, to permit of hopes of
lasting peace. In the United States of America the tension between
the northern and southern states was already becoming acute, while
in Europe the prevailing attitude of the powers towards one another
was that of frigid politeness, which at any moment might thaw into
hostilities. So there was no lack of incentive to continue the
development of the fighting marine. The principal reasons why more was
not done at this time were that naval architects and administrators
were at the parting of the ways. Some urged that the types with which
they were familiar should be adhered to, and that though armoured
vessels were useful in the war against Russia, where peculiar
conditions had to be met, it did not follow that such vessels would
be of use in another war; and it was pointed out that they would
be of no value whatever in a naval engagement on account of their
unseaworthiness, or rather clumsiness, and the difficulty of handling
them. Others, more far-seeing, urged that iron-clad vessels were
bound to come sooner or later, and sooner rather than later, since it
had been demonstrated that such were not only possible but, so far as
they had been used in the war, effective, and that they showed that
vessels of less size, armour-plated and carrying a few heavy guns,
would be more than a match for any wooden line-of-battle ship afloat.
It was contended that the gunboats which silenced the Kinburn forts
would be able to give a good account of themselves against the best
three-deckers in the allied fleets. But the Admiralty, still convinced
of the excellence of the type which had done so well in the past,
retained that type and went on building wooden ships, as for that
matter did all the admiralties of the world.
In 1858, there was designed the last and the finest line-of-battle
ship constructed of wood for the British navy. She was launched at
Portsmouth in 1859, and commissioned in 1864, and under the name of the
_Victoria_ served as flagship in the Mediterranean, and was removed
from active service three years later. She was a screw steamer, with
horizontal return-connecting-rod engines by Maudslay, indicating 4,000
h.p., and with the boilers giving 22 lb. pressure she could steam at 12
miles an hour. She carried, on her upper deck, twenty-two 32-pounders
and one 68-pounder; on her main deck thirty-four 32-pounders, on her
middle deck thirty-two guns of the same size, and on her lower deck
thirty-two 8-inch guns. A comparison of her armament and that of the
next _Victoria_ shows the remarkable change made in the course of a
few years in naval artillery, no less than in the arrangement of the
weapons on ship board.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account