Washington, its sights and insights [1909]Monroe, Harriet Earhart
History
Washington, its sights and insights [1909]
Monroe, Harriet Earhart
Washington (D.C.) -- Description and travel
The carrier consists of an endless cable, with two metal baskets at
an equal distance from each other. These work on the cable, the
power for which is furnished by the Library dynamo. The books are
carried through the tunnel, and when they reach the wheels which
change the direction, the speed is automatically slackened, so that
the delivery is made gently and without the possibility of damage.
Smaller books are first placed in a large sole-leather case. The
carriers are taken through the tunnel at the rate of six hundred
feet per minute. Should any trouble occur, the mechanism can be
instantly stopped by an electric button, one at each end. The
machinery of the carriers and its instalment was largely the work of
Superintendent Green.
All who witnessed the test were surprised at the ease and swiftness
with which the books could be sent for, taken from the shelves, and
transported a distance of about a quarter of a mile. Librarian Young
was very much gratified. He characterized the system as remarkable.
The test also demonstrated that the arrangement of the books in
their new quarters is perfect, as those sent for were selected at
random and were readily picked out from the enormous collection by
those in charge of the shelves.
In this labyrinth of beauty, known as the Library of Congress, I believe
a man would see no fault. But women, except as allegorical characters,
such as imaginary figures of history, science, pomology, art, etc., have
no share in the scheme of ornamentation. But men of all ages, of all
branches of art, science, commerce, and literature, are memorialized in
painting, sculpture, writing, or suggestion of some kind, either
concrete or abstract. It is true, Sappho (whom I suppose the artist
thought was a man), grown dim in the long vista of years, is a lone
woman among the world's _élite_. No George Eliot, nor George Sand, nor
Harriet Hosmer, nor Rosa Bonheur, nor Mrs. Browning, nor Mrs. Stowe now
stands near Holmes, Whittier, Longfellow, Byron, or Landseer. This
omission is not like our gallant American men.
I remember once at a table in London some distinguished English women
were complimenting the achievements of American women. I replied, "I
have met the college women of almost every European country. I do not
find American women in any way mentally superior to the women of Europe.
But American women accomplish much more than their sisters east of the
Atlantic simply because of our men. Now here in England your husband and
brothers insist on silence, but with us if a woman sings or talks well
it is the hand of her husband or father that leads her to the front, and
it is the kindness of our men that starts us on our public life, helps
us at hard places, and encourages us everywhere. No, it is not our
_women_ who are superior, it is our men, our gracious, helpful men."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account