Watson's Magazine, Vol. IV, No. 1, March, 1906Various
General
Watson's Magazine, Vol. IV, No. 1, March, 1906
Various
United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals
The $3,700,000 surplus exacted the first year, under the new rates,
is not to be used for paid-up or extended insurance or cash-surrender
values, but is simply to be kept on hand as a reserve. The reserve, which
has heretofore been carried in the pockets of the members, is now to be
transferred to the pockets of the Supreme Council. Why are the members
of the order, who have carried their insurance at great sacrifices, to
have an additional burden placed on them? Why must this great reserve be
created unless for the same reasons it was created in the three great
companies in New York City? What is the object of creating a reserve
when there is no paid-up or extended insurance and no cash-surrender to
be made, and when assessments are required to be called for as needed
to pay death losses? Why should any assessment company have a reserve
beyond a few assessments ahead? What kind of actuaries did the Supreme
Council have to make tables to produce such results? What fit guardians
of 250,000 people are the one hundred and fifteen members of the Supreme
Council who would adopt a table of rates producing such results? The
control of the funds must have driven these one hundred and fifteen
people mad to have produced tables which will so work. Would it not have
been better to have called extra assessments from time to time under the
authority of the laws of the order and of the State of Massachusetts,
until the order was compelled to fail, than to have adopted the new
rates, which are more expensive than old-line insurance and which if
approved in the legal contest now pending will insure the failure of the
order at once?
The only true assessment insurance is to pay the death losses as they
occur, by assessments, and which must include a fund for management and
control. When the assessments become too great the company dissolves and
that is the end of it. All those who have not died during its existence,
or who have lapsed in the same time, have lost their bets, and those who
have died have won.
I am not able to give the number who have been members of the order since
its origin. It could not have been more than 400,000. Of this number
35,000, or one-twelfth, have died. Over 33 per cent., or 133,333, have
lapsed, and if the institution fails, as it certainly will, 367,000 have
lost every dollar they have put in, in order that 35,000, or one in
twelve, might draw prizes.
Such institutions are contrary to public policy and should be suppressed.
Each state insurance department should require such statistics as will
show all the facts any one might wish to know.
If I had the exact statistics, I am satisfied the proportion of those who
pay in and lose would be much higher than I gave it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account