Watson's Magazine, Vol. IV, No. 2, April, 1906Various
History
Watson's Magazine, Vol. IV, No. 2, April, 1906
Various
United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals
Compared to the colossal stakes and winnings of the Stock Exchange, the
gambling which goes on at Monaco, or at Tom Taggart’s place at French
Lick Springs is puerile. Since the world was created, no such gigantic
gaming has been known as the mad speculations in the New York Stock
Exchange.
Of course, the losses are as large as the gains, but those on the inside
of the Exchange have an enormous advantage over those on the outside.
Those on the inside are generally the masterful fellows who shear the
lambs outside.
The organized, experienced and expert players within the Exchange have
the same point of advantage over the gullible, unorganized public that
the cool dealers at the gaming tables have over the men and women who
buck against the bank.
For the privilege of _getting on the inside of the game_, Mr. So and So
pays nearly $100,000.
* * * * *
NEW YORK, Jan. 7, 1906.
_Hon. Thomas E. Watson, Thomson, Ga._
DEAR SIR: Will you kindly answer the following questions in
your _Educational Department_?
(1) What is the difference between Single Tax and Populism?
(2) Is it true that Grover Cleveland is to receive $12,000 per
year from the “Big Three,” and, if so, why?
(3) Why was not the Prudential Company investigated? Their
premiums are about the same as the others. In talking with
their agents I find them the same as agents of the “Big Three.”
(4) Is Paul Morton treating the policy holders justly when he
_takes_ $80,000 per year as his salary?
Your Magazine is a God-send to the people at large and I trust
it will be read by men and women throughout the country.
Thanking you in advance, I am.
Very truly,
⸺ ⸺.
ANSWER
(1) Single Tax puts all the burden of supporting the Government on one
form of wealth, viz.: the value of land.
Populism equalizes taxation, and would compel each owner of property to
pay in proportion to his wealth.
The Single Taxer would put all the load on land, leaving money, stocks,
bonds and personal property of every sort untaxed.
Populists cannot see any justice in taking the value out of the land of
the farmer, while twelve billion dollars of railroad stocks and bonds go
untaxed.
Carnegie holds about three hundred million dollars in the bonds of the
Steel Trust. Those bonds are as good as gold. They pay Mr. Carnegie a
regal income. Why should my land have the value taxed out of it and
Carnegie’s bonds go free? There is no justice in this scheme. It does not
measure up to the Populist dogma of “Equal rights to all.”
(2) Yes. To cloak insurance rascality with his respected name. The
robbers who run those insurance companies simply bought the use of Mr.
Cleveland’s name. He consents to play the humble but useful part of decoy
duck for $1,000 per month.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account