Waves and ripples in water, air, and æther : $b Being a course of Christmas lectures delivered at the Royal Institution of Great BritainFleming, J. A. (John Ambrose), Sir
Science
Waves and ripples in water, air, and æther : $b Being a course of Christmas lectures delivered at the Royal Institution of Great Britain
Fleming, J. A. (John Ambrose), Sir
Electric waves; Sound; Waves
Let ABC be the prism (see Fig. 50) represented in plan, and let _ab_,
_ab_, _ab_, be a train of sound waves advancing against the face AC.
As soon as the left end _b_ of the wave _ab_ touches the face AC, and
enters the carbonic acid gas, its speed will begin to be retarded, and
in the time taken by the right end _a_ to move in air from _a_ to _c_,
the left end will have moved in carbonic acid gas, by a less distance,
_bd_, the distances _ca_ and _db_, being in the ratio of 5 to 4. Hence
it is clear that the wave-front _ab_ will be swung round, and when the
wave has wholly entered the prism, its direction of motion will have
been bent round to the left.
The same thing will happen at emergence. The right end, _e_, of the
wave _ef_ gets out into the air whilst the left end, _f_, is still in
carbonic acid. Accordingly, in the time taken for the end _f_ to move
to _h_, the end _e_ will have moved a greater distance, in the ratio
of 5 to 4, to _g_, and therefore we have again a bending round of the
wave-direction. It is evident, therefore, that this unequal retarding
of the two sides of the wave will result in a _refraction_, or bending,
of the wave-direction, and that whereas the sound-ray was proceeding,
before entering the prism, in the direction of the arrow on the right
hand, it is altered, after passing through the prism, so as to be
travelling in the direction of the arrow on the left-hand side. The
double bending of the sound-ray is therefore caused by, and is evidence
of the fact that, the sound wave travels more slowly in carbonic acid
gas than it does in air.[24]
Let us, then, bring these statements to the test of experiment. We
again start in action the whistle W, and place the sensitive flame in
the line of the lens-axis, and notice how violently the flame flares
(see Fig. 51). The flame is now at a distance of 4 feet from the lens.
I move the flame 1 foot to the left hand, and it is now outside the
beam of sound, and remains quiescent. The prism P, previously filled
with carbonic acid gas, is then inserted between the sound-lens and the
flame, and close to the former. When properly placed, the sensitive
flame F immediately dips and roars. It will be abundantly evident to
you that this can only arise because the prism has bent round the
sound-beam, and deflected it on to the flame. But if the beam is bent
round, then it follows that if the flame is now moved back to the
central position F′, the prism remaining in front of the lens, that the
flame will not now roar, and this we find to be the case. If, however,
the prism is then removed, the flame at once bursts into a roar.
[Illustration: FIG. 51.—The refraction of a sound-ray.]
This experiment proves to demonstration that we can refract waves of
sound just as we can refract ripples on water.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account