Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, ShropshireTyerman, L. (Luke)
Religion
Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, Shropshire
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Fletcher, John, 1729-1785
Such was John Jones, Wesley’s friend, and at one time held in high
esteem by Wesley’s brother Charles. His ambition to be employed in Lady
Huntingdon’s college at Trevecca was not inordinate. Fifteen years
before, Charles Wesley had thought him qualified to train young men for
the ministry, and from one of his letters, written in 1777, and
published in the _Wesleyan Methodist Magazine_ for 1837, it is evident
that Charles Wesley’s opinion was well founded. The letter was addressed
to a gentleman of Magdalene College, Cambridge, who was about to be
ordained, and wished Mr. Jones’s advice respecting the composition of
sermons and preaching them.
“Prayer,” said he, “should always precede the composing of a
discourse. In general, the explication of the text or context, if they
need it, should not be too short. The propositions or doctrines should
not be too long nor too many, and the clearer they are the better. The
illustrations should be proper and lively; the proofs close and home;
the motives strong and cogent; the inferences and application natural,
and not laboured. For if we cannot persuade the passions, we shall go
but a little way with most of our hearers. This was George
Whitefield’s peculiar talent; but I do not mean to persuade you to
bawl as loud as he did, and yet I would advise you to raise your voice
in the application of your discourse. Eight-and-thirty years ago I
thought it an easy matter to prove most points in divinity. I have
been learning the contrary ever since, and I find it now very
difficult, by Scriptures properly understood and applied, to prove
many things which I once thought quite clear. I find it necessary to
understand the Scripture I bring in as a proof before I use it as
such. I will add one thing more. You will find it very difficult to
use such plain language as will be understood in most congregations.
Avoid long periods as much as possible. Imitate Cæsar rather than
Cicero; leave the latter to Dr. Middleton and Samuel Furley. It is far
better to be understood by our hearers than to be admired by getting
out of their depth. To do all the good we can is our one business in
life.”
Mr. Jones was a man of sense, and piety, and experience; and yet
Fletcher hesitated in recommending him to be appointed a tutor in
Trevecca College. Did Fletcher sympathize with his friend Charles Wesley
in the repugnance which the latter felt to Mr. Jones’s ordination by
Erasmus, the bishop of the Greek Church? Perhaps so; at all events, the
following letter to the Countess of Huntingdon was cautious, if not
cold:—
“MADELEY, _July 1, 1769_.
“MY LADY,—Mr. Jones’s letter puzzled me a little. I did not know what
answer to make to it. I have, however, sat down, and, after an
introduction, I say to him—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account