Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, ShropshireTyerman, L. (Luke)
Religion
Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, Shropshire
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Fletcher, John, 1729-1785
This letter is inserted in the “Life and Times of Wesley,” where it
was published for the _first_ time. It is reproduced here, because
Fletcher’s life would not be complete without it.—L. T.
Lady Huntingdon did not write to Wesley, but he wrote a long and
faithful letter to her, dated June 19, 1771, in which he insisted that
the doctrines he preached now were the same as he had preached for above
thirty years.[227]
Shirley did not “call in his circular letter.” It would have been more
to the honour of himself and his friends had he done so; for, when
Wesley’s Conference assembled on August 6, the response to it was
ridiculous. Of all “the serious clergy and laity throughout the land,”
only Shirley himself, and the Rev. Cradock Glascott, and the Rev. Mr.
Owen, ministers officiating in the Countess of Huntingdon’s chapels,
together with Messrs. Lloyd, Ireland, and Winter, and two students (!)
from Trevecca College attended. After what had taken place, Wesley,
without arrogance, might have disdained these insignificant self-elected
deputies; but he graciously allowed them to enter his Conference. First
of all, Wesley prayed; then Shirley asked if the letters[228] of himself
and the Countess of Huntingdon had been read to the Conference; and,
being answered in the negative, he asked leave to read them himself,
which was granted. A long conversation followed, and then Shirley
produced a written declaration which he wished the Conference to sign.
Wesley examined it, and made some alterations, which Shirley says were
“not very material;” and then Wesley and fifty-three of his itinerant
preachers appended to it their signatures. The declaration was as
follows:—
“Whereas the doctrinal points in the Minutes of a Conference, held in
London, August 7, 1770, have been understood to favour justification
by works; now the Rev. John Wesley and others assembled in Conference,
do declare that we had no such meaning, and that we abhor the doctrine
of Justification by Works as a most perilous and abominable doctrine:
and, as the said Minutes are not sufficiently guarded in the way they
are expressed, we hereby solemnly declare, in the sight of God, that
we have no trust or confidence but in the alone merits of our Lord and
Saviour Jesus Christ, for Justification or Salvation, either in life,
death, or the day of judgment: and, though no one is a real Christian
believer, (and consequently cannot be saved) who doth not good works,
where there is time and opportunity, yet our works have no part in
meriting or purchasing our salvation from first to last, either in
whole or in part.”
Footnote 227:
“Life and Times of Wesley,” vol. iii., p. 93.
Footnote 228:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account