Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, ShropshireTyerman, L. (Luke)
Religion
Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, Shropshire
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Fletcher, John, 1729-1785
“We never supposed that the natural will of fallen man is free _to
good_, before it is more or less touched and rectified by grace. All
we assert is, that, whether a man chooses good or evil, his _will_ is
_free_, or it does not deserve the name of _will_. It is as far from
us to think that man, unassisted by Divine grace, is sufficient to
will spiritual good; as to suppose that when he wills it by grace he
does not will it _freely_. And, therefore, agreeably to our Tenth
Article, which you quote against us without the least reason, we
steadily assert that _we have no power to do good works, without the
grace of God preventing us_, not that we may have a _free_ will, for
this we always had in the above-mentioned sense, but _that we may have
a good will_; believing that, as confirmed saints and angels have a
_free_ will, though they have no _evil_ will, so abandoned reprobates
and devils have a _free_ will, though they have no _good_ will.”
These may appear to the cursory reader metaphysical niceties of no
practical importance; but, a hundred years ago, they were considered
doctrines of vital interest. The difference between Fletcher and his
Calvinian friends is well stated by himself:—
“From our mutual concessions, it is evident we agree, 1. That the will
is always _free_; 2. That the will of man, considered as fallen in
Adam, and unassisted by the grace of God, is only _free to evil_; and,
3. That when he is _free to good_, free to choose life, he has this
from redeeming grace.
“But, although we agree in those material points, the difference
between us is still very considerable; for, we assert, that through
the Mediator promised to all mankind in Adam, God, by His free grace,
restores to ALL _mankind_ a talent of _free will to good_, by which
they are put in a capacity of _choosing life or death_, that is, of
acquitting themselves well or ill, at their option, in their present
state of trial.
“This _you_ utterly deny, maintaining that man is not in a state of
probation; and that as Christ died for none but the elect, none but
they can ever have any degree of saving grace, that is, _any free will
to good_. Hence, you conclude that _all_ the elect are in a state of
_finished salvation_; and _necessarily_, _infallibly_, and
_irresistibly_ choose life; while _all_ the reprobates are shut up in
a state of _finished_ damnation; and _necessarily_, _infallibly_, and
_irresistibly_ choose death.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account