Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, ShropshireTyerman, L. (Luke)
Religion
Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, Shropshire
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Fletcher, John, 1729-1785
“Though I have solemnly subscribed to the Thirty-Nine Articles of the
Church of England, and have affirmed that I believe them from my
heart, yet I think our Reformers were profoundly ignorant of true
Christianity, when they declared, in the Ninth Article, that ‘the
infection of nature doth remain in them which are regenerate;’ and, in
the Fifteenth, that ‘all we, the rest (Christ only excepted), although
baptized and born again in Christ, yet offend in many things; and _if
we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in
us_.’ This I totally deny, because it cuts up, root and branch, my
favourite doctrine of _Perfection_; and, therefore, let Peter, Paul,
James, or John, say what they will; and let reformers and martyrs join
their syren song, their eyes were at best but half opened, for want of
a little _Foundery_ eye-salve; therefore, I cannot look upon them as
adult believers, and fathers in Christ.”
The Eleven Articles were subscribed, “J. F.,” “J. W.,” and “W. S.;”
which may be taken as the initial letters of the names of John Fletcher,
John Wesley, and Walter Sellon.
“What! more _finishing strokes_!” remarked the _Monthly Review_ of
January, 1775, in its notice of Mr. Hill’s new pamphlet. “This
retiring champion, however, like the Parthians of old, is not less
formidable in his retreat than in a direct attack. He here lets fly at
the _Arminians_ and _Perfectionists_ one of his sharpest pointed
arrows. He styles it ‘_their creed_.’ He says he has ‘composed it from
their sentiments;’ and he adds that he ‘can scarcely read it without
horror.’ Yet he thinks himself justified in publishing it, as Mr.
Fletcher still continued the controversy with so much warmth.”
All this is deeply to be regretted. Mr. Hill had declared his
determination to abandon this painful warfare, and yet here he provokes
a continuance of it. It is true that, meanwhile, Fletcher had published
his “Answer to the Finishing Stroke” of Mr. Hill; but Fletcher had done
this, not because he desired the controversy to be prolonged, but
because “The Finishing Stroke” contained so many grave attacks on
Fletcher’s moral character, that Fletcher’s honour could not be
maintained without an “Answer” being written. At this point the war
might have ended; but, by appending the “Creed for Arminians and
Perfectionists” to his Three Letters, Mr. Hill re-opened the sluice, and
“the waters of strife” flowed as fiercely as ever.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account