Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, ShropshireTyerman, L. (Luke)
Religion
Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, Shropshire
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Fletcher, John, 1729-1785
Fletcher’s “Answer” to Richard Hill’s “Finishing Stroke,” and his
“Remarks upon _Mr. Fulsome’s_ Antinomian Creed,” are able, and
characteristic of the writer; but contain no biographical facts worth
mentioning. Two extracts, however, from the “Appendix,” upon the
remaining differences between the Calvinists and the anti-Calvinists,
may be useful; inasmuch as, in a condensed form, they exhibit the point
to which, in Fletcher’s opinion, the controversy had brought both
parties with respect to the principal of Wesley’s “Minutes” of 1770.
Fletcher writes:—
“On both sides, we agree to maintain, in opposition to Socinians and
Deists, that the grand, the primary, and properly meritorious cause of
our justification, from first to last, both in the day of conversion
and in the day of judgment, is only the precious atonement and the
infinite merits of our Lord Jesus Christ. We all agree likewise that
in the day of conversion faith is the _instrumental cause_ of our
justification before God. Nay, if I mistake not, we come one step
nearer each other, for we equally hold that, after conversion, the
works of faith are in this world, and will be in the day of judgment,
the _evidencing cause_ of our justification; that is, the works of
faith (under the above-mentioned primary cause of our salvation, and
in subordination to the faith that gives them birth), are now, and
will be in the great day, the _evidence_ that shall instrumentally
_cause_ our justification as believers. Thus Mr. Hill says [_Review_,
p. 149], ‘Neither Mr. Shirley, nor I, nor any Calvinist that I ever
heard of, denies that, though a sinner be _justified in the sight of
God by Christ alone_, he is _declaratively justified by works, both
here and at the day of judgment_.’ And the Rev. Mr. Madan, in his
sermon on ‘_justification by works stated, explained, and reconciled
with justification by faith_,’ says [p. 29], ‘By Christ only are we
_meritoriously_ justified, and by faith only are we _instrumentally_
justified _in the sight of God_; but by works, and not by faith only,
are we _declaratively justified before men and angels_.’ From these
two quotations, which could easily be multiplied to twenty, it is
evident that pious Calvinists hold the doctrine of a _justification_
by the works of faith; or, as Mr. Madan expresses it, after St. James,
_by works, and not by faith only_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account