Westward empire : $b or, the great drama of human progressMagoon, Elias Lyman
History
Westward empire : $b or, the great drama of human progress
Magoon, Elias Lyman
Civilization, Western
The second period was that of special refinement in prose, and of
increased erudition. Cæsar and Sallust are its exponents as historians,
and Cicero is its chief representative as an orator and philosopher.
In a word, it was the great culmination of the Augustan age, wherein
Lucretius and Catullus were the harbingers of Virgil, Horace, and Ovid,
and the varied treasures of all the great masters of prose and learned
poetry were garnered in the lucid narrative of Livy.
As the first period was redolent of life, and the second teemed with
learning, so the third is known by its excessive embellishment. It was
called "the silver age," and was covered with abundance of filigree.
It produced the only fabulist of Rome, Phædrus; Juvenal, the satirist;
Martial, the epigrammatist; Tacitus, the historian; Quintilian, the
critic; and the elegant letter-writer, Pliny. These are the best names
of the later period of the Augustan age, and these decisively mark the
progress of decline. Fancifulness and formalism ruled supreme, and
whatever of independent thought the earlier periods had known, was now
superseded by servility and decay.
The Romans inherited no legendary stories adapted to the higher
order of dramatic composition. The early traditions which formed the
groundwork of their history were private, and not public, property--the
pedigrees and memorials of separate families, and therefore not
interesting to the people at large. There were no Attic Eumolpidæ
on the seven hills to preserve antique reminiscences as a national
treasure, nor did they, like fragrant plants, twine themselves along
the rocky base of the Roman capitol, as the thrilling traditions of
ancestral Greece did round the chaste altars of that susceptible
people. The Latin poets might sometimes collect withered fictions,
and weave them into their rhythmical records of antiquity; but they
possessed no vital beauty, no talismanic power for awakening national
enthusiasm. Indeed, who could heartily enjoy allusions to the past,
since old Rome had been superseded by a new race. The few veterans
who yet survived the bloody wars of Greece, Africa, Gaul, and Spain,
were settled in remote military colonies, and a careless disregard of
every thing in the metropolis, except luxurious sustenance and shows,
paved the way for a speedy downfall. Rome was peopled with step-sons
only, as Scipio Æmilius designated the populace, and the tragedy most
genial to their taste and ambition was that which was most replete with
fulsome compliments to favorite individuals. In Greece, the poet was
deemed an inspired being, and his tongue was regarded as the divinest
medium for the communion of the visible with the invisible; but at
Rome, poetry was nothing more than a dull recreation, and its author
was no better than a parasite or a slave. At Athens, the impersonation
of a tragedy was an act of worship; the theatre was a temple, and the
altar of a deity was its central, point. With the Romans, the thymele
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account