What Cheer; Or, Roger Williams in Banishment: A PoemDurfee, Job
History
What Cheer; Or, Roger Williams in Banishment: A Poem
Durfee, Job
Williams, Roger, 1604?-1683 -- Poetry
This interference of the government forced him to leave Salem. “He
removed to Plymouth, and was engaged assistant to Mr. Ralph Smith, the
pastor of the church at that place. Here he remained until he found his
views of Religious Toleration and strict non-conformity gave offence to
some of his hearers, when he returned again to Salem, and was settled
there after Mr. Skelton’s death, which took place on the 2d of August,
1634.” In this situation Williams preached against the cross in the
ensign, as a relic of papal superstition. His preaching however, on
this topic, does not seem to have been a subject of complaint, only as
it led some of his friends to the indiscretion of defacing the colors.
His persecutors, in excusing this act to the government of England, say
that they did so, “with as much wariness as they might, being doubtful
themselves of the lawfulness of a cross in an ensign.” But though he
may have given no offence by declaring an opinion on this subject
so little at variance with their own, yet when he ventured to speak
against the king’s patent, by which he had granted to his subjects the
lands which belonged to the Indians; and, above all, to maintain that
the civil magistrate ought not to interfere in matters of conscience,
except for the preservation of peace, his presence within the
jurisdiction of Massachusetts could no longer be tolerated. A summons
was granted for his appearance at the next court.
He appeared accordingly. “It was laid to his charge,” says Winthrop,
“that, being under question before the magistracy and churches for
divers dangerous opinions, viz: That the magistrate ought not to punish
for the breaches of the first table, otherwise than in such cases as
do disturb the public peace. 2d. That he ought not to tender an oath
to an unregenerate man. 3d. That a man ought not to pray with such,
though wife, children, &c. 4th. That a man ought not to give thanks
after sacrament nor after meat, &c., and that other churches were
about to write the church of Salem to admonish him of these errors,
notwithstanding the church had since called him to the office of
Teacher.”
These charges having been read, all the magistrates and ministers
concurred in denouncing the opinions of Williams as erroneous and
dangerous, and agreed that the calling him to office at that time was
a great contempt of authority. He and the church of Salem were allowed
until the next General Court to consider of these charges, and then
either to give satisfaction to the Court, or else to expect sentence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account