"Mr. Garnet rejoined that Bates was a dead man, and therefore
although he would not discredit him, yet he was bound to keep that
secret which was spoken in confession as well as Greenway."[282]
Having thus shown that Father Gerard's argument, that the statement
about Greenway was not produced at Garnet's trial, cannot be maintained;
that his argument drawn from the account of the arrest of Garnet and
others is irrelevant, and that Salisbury's letter to Favat, so far from
contradicting the received story, goes a long way to confirm it, I
proceed to ask why we are not to accept the report of _A true and
perfect relation_, where Coke is represented as giving the substance of
the confession of Bates, beginning with Catesby's revelation of the plot
to him, followed by his full confession to Greenway and Greenway's
answer, somewhat amplified indeed, as Coke's manner was, but obviously
founded on Bates's confession of December 4, 1605.
"Then they," _i.e._ Catesby and Winter, "told him that he was to
receive the sacrament for the more assurance, and thereupon he went
to confession to the said Tesmond the Jesuit, and in his confession
told him that he was to conceal a very dangerous piece of work,
that his master Catesby and Thomas Winter had imparted unto him,
and said he much feared the matter to be utterly unlawful, and
therefore thereon desired the counsel of the Jesuit, and revealed
unto him the whole intent and purpose of blowing up the Parliament
House upon the first day of the assembly, at what time the King,
the Queen, the Prince, the Lords spiritual and temporal, the
judges, knights, citizens, burgesses should all have been there
convented and met together. But the Jesuit being a confederate
therein before, resolved and encouraged him in the action, and said
that he should be secret in that which his master had imparted unto
him, for that it was for a good cause, adding, moreover, that it
was not dangerous unto him nor any offence to conceal it; and
thereupon the Jesuit gave him absolution, and Bates received the
sacrament of him, in the company of his master, Robert Catesby, and
Thomas Winter."[283]
We have not, indeed, the evidence set forth, but we have a distinct
intimation that amongst the confessions read was one from which 'it
appeared that Bates was resolved from what he understood concerning the
powder treason, and being therein warranted by the Jesuits.'[284]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account