"I showed him my letter from Rome," wrote Garnet afterwards, "and
admonished him of the Pope's pleasure. I doubted he had some device
in his head, whatsoever it was, being against the Pope's will, it
could not prosper. He said that what he meant to do, if the Pope
knew, he would not hinder, for the general good of the country. But
I being earnest with him, and inculcating the Pope's prohibition
did add this _quia expresse hoc Papa non vult et prohibet_, he told
me he was not bound to take knowledge by me of the Pope's will. I
said indeed my own credit was but little, but our General, whose
letter I had read to him, was a man everywhere respected for his
wisdom and virtue, so I desired him that before he attempted
anything he would acquaint the Pope. He said he would not for all
the world make his particular project known to him, for fear of
discovery. I wished him at the last in general to inform him how
things stood here by some lay gentleman."
This suggestion took shape in the mission of Sir Edmund Baynham. We are
only concerned here with Garnet's expostulations, and again it must be
said that they appear to have been singularly mild, considering all that
Catesby had admitted.
A few days later Garnet learnt the whole truth from Greenway, in a way
which is said to have been tantamount to confession. Admitting once more
that he may have been bound to keep silence to others on these details,
he could not keep silence to himself. There are no partitions in the
brain to divide what one wishes to know from what one wishes not to
know, and if Garnet thoroughly abhorred the plot, he was surely bound to
take up Catesby's earlier self-revelations, and to strive to the
uttermost to probe the matter to the bottom, in all legitimate ways. No
doubt he had moments in which his conscience was sorely troubled, but
they were followed by no decisive action, and it is useless to say that
he expected to meet Catesby at 'All-hallowtide.' With all the Jesuit
machinery under his hands, he could surely have found Catesby out
between July and November, and this omission is perhaps the most fatal
condemnation of Garnet's course. If he had for many months known enough
otherwise than in confession to enable him to remonstrate with Catesby
in November, why could he not have remonstrated four months before with
much more hope of success?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account