[94] Compare this with Fawkes's declaration at his second examination (_G. P. B._ 16, A.) "Being demanded when this good act had been done which must have brought this realm in peril to be subdued by some foreign prince, of what foreign prince he and his compliees could have wished to have been governed, one more than another, he doth protest upon his soul that neither he nor any other with whom he had conferred would have spared the last drop of their blood to have resisted any foreign prince whatsoever." Are we seriously asked to believe that Salisbury placed this crown of sturdy patriotism on the brows of those whom he wished to paint as the most atrocious villains? [95] Juan de Velasco, Duke of Frias, Constable of Castile, arrived at Brussels about the middle of January 1604 to conduct a negotiation for peace with England. There he remained, delegating his powers to others. This date of the Constable's arrival is important, as showing that Winter's conversation with Catesby cannot have taken place earlier than the second half of January. [96] Hugh Owen was, as Father Gerard says (p. 173, note 1), 'A soldier and not a priest, though in the _Calendar of State Papers_ he is continually styled "Father Owen," or "Owen the Jesuit."' He is however mistaken in saying that Mrs. Everett Green inserted the title without warrant in the original documents. A paper of intelligence received on April 29, 1604, begins, "Father Owen, Father Baldwin and Colonel Jaques, three men that rule the Archduke at their pleasure," &c. [97] In 1604 Easter term began on April 25, and ended May 21. [98] This distinctly implies that Percy did not know the secret before, and I therefore wish to retract my former argument--which is certainly not conclusive--in favour of an earlier knowledge by Percy. _Hist. of Engl._ 1603-1642, i. 235, note 1. [99] "In his declaration, November 8th, however," writes Father Gerard (p. 91, note 1), "he gives as a reason for going abroad, 'lest, being a dangerous man, he should be known and suspected.'" I see no discrepancy between the two statements. Having been long abroad, Fawkes's face would not be known to the ordinary Londoner as that of a Recusant, and he was therefore better qualified to act as a watchman than others who were so known. On the other hand, when there was no need for anybody to watch at all, somebody who had known him in Flanders might notify the Government of his appearance in England, and thereby raise suspicions against him. Besides, there were other reasons for his going over which Fawkes did not think fit to bring to the notice of the Government. [100] Began October 9, ended November 28. [101] Marginal note: "This was about a month before Michaelmas." [102] The Duke of York, afterwards Charles I. [103] Some such words as 'we resolved' are probably omitted here. [104] In MS. 'taken it before.' [105] Interlined in the King's hand 'which was about four thousand pounds.'