Fawkes, therefore, lodged out when his master came, not because there
was not a second room in the house, but because there was only one bed.
If Mrs. Percy arrived alone she would probably find one bed sufficient
for herself and her husband. If she brought any maidservants with her,
beds could be provided for them without much difficulty. Is it not
likely that the plan of sending Fawkes out to sleep was contrived with
the object of persuading the Whynniards that as matters stood no more
than one person could occupy the house at night, and of thus putting
them off the scent, at the time when the miners were congregated in it?
A more serious problem is presented by Father Gerard's inquiry 'how
proceedings so remarkable' as the digging of the mine could have escaped
the notice, not only of the Government, but of the entire neighbourhood.
"This," he continues, "it must be remembered, was most populous.
There were people living in the very building a part of which
sheltered the conspirators. Around were thickly clustered the
dwellings of the Keeper of the Wardrobe, auditors and tellers of
the Exchequer, and other such officials. There were tradespeople
and workmen constantly employed close to the spot where the work
was going on; while the public character of the place makes it
impossible to suppose that tenants such as Percy and his friends,
who were little better than lodgers, could claim the exclusive use
of anything beyond the rooms they rented--even when allowed the use
of them--or could shut against the neighbours and visitors in
general the precincts of so frequented a spot."[144]
To this is added the following footnote:--
"The buildings of the dissolved College of St. Stephen, comprising
those around the House of Lords, were granted by Edward VI. to Sir
Ralph Lane. They reverted to the Crown under Elizabeth, and were
appropriated as residences for the auditors and tellers of the
Exchequer. The locality became so populous that in 1606 it was
forbidden to erect more houses."
This statement is reinforced by a conjectural view of the neighbourhood
founded on the 'best authorities' by Mr. H. W. Brewer.[145] Mr. Brewer
who has since kindly examined with me the drawings and plans in the
Crace Collection, on which I rely, has, I think, been misled by those
early semi-pictorial maps, which, though they may be relied on for
larger buildings, such as the House of Lords or St. Stephen's Chapel,
are very imaginative in their treatment of private houses. In any case I
deny the existence of the two large houses placed by him between what I
infer to have been Whynniard's house and the river side.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account