It may at least be freely granted that it is hardly probable that
Monteagle had not heard of the plot before. As Jardine puts it
forcibly:--
"The circumstance of Lord Monteagle's unexpected visit to his house
at Hoxton, without any other assignable reason, on the evening in
question, looks like the arrangement of a convenient scene; and it
is deserving of notice that the gentleman to whom his lordship gave
the letter to read at his table was Thomas Ward, an intimate friend
of several of the conspirators, and suspected to have been an
accomplice in the treason. The open reading of such a letter before
his household (which, unless it be supposed to be part of a
counterplot, seems a very unnatural and imprudent course for Lord
Monteagle to adopt) might be intended to secure evidence that the
letter was the first intimation he had of the matter, and would
have the effect of giving notice to Ward that the plot was
discovered, in order that he might communicate the fact to the
conspirators. In truth he did so on the very next morning; and if
they had then taken the alarm, and instantly fled to Flanders (as
it is natural to suppose they would have done) every part of
Tresham's object would have been attained. This scheme was
frustrated by the unexpected and extraordinary infatuation of the
conspirators themselves, who, notwithstanding their knowledge of
the letter, disbelieved the discovery of the plot from the absence
of any search at the cellar, and, omitting to avail themselves of
the means afforded for their flight, still lingered in
London."[200]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account