What was the Gunpowder Plot? The Traditional Story Tested by Original EvidenceGerard, John
History
What was the Gunpowder Plot? The Traditional Story Tested by Original Evidence
Gerard, John
Gunpowder Plot, 1605
_G._ It was farther resolved amongst us that the same day that this
action should have been performed some other of our confederates should
have surprised the person of the Lady Elizabeth the Kings eldest
daughter, who was kept in Warwickshire at the Lo. Harringtons house, and
presently have proclaimed her for Queene, having a project of a
Proclamation ready for the purpose, wherein we made no mention of
altering of Religion,----
* * * * *
---- nor would have avowed the deed to be ours untill we should have had
power enough to make our partie good, and then we would have avowed
both.
[_A. The draft._]
* They meant all soe to have sent for the Prisoners in the Tower to have
come to them, of whom particularly they had some consultation.
* He confesseth that the place of Rendez-vous was in Warwickshire, and
that armour was sent thither, but the particuler thereof he knowes not.
He confesseth that they had consultation for the takinge of the Lady
Marye into their possession, but knew not how to come by her.
And confesseth that provision was made by some of the conspiracye of
some armour of proofe this last Summer for this Action.
* He confesseth that the powder was bought of the common Purse of the
Confederates.
L. Admyrall }
L. Chamberlayne }
Erle of Devonshire } attended by M^r
Erle of Northampton } Attorney generall.
Erle of Salisbury }
Erle of Marr }
L. cheif Justice }
[_Endorsed_] Examination of Guy Fauks, Nov^r 8th, 1605.
[_B. The Confession as signed._]
_H._ Concerning Duke Charles, the Kings second son, we hadd sundrie
consultations how to sease on his person, but because wee found no
meanes how to compasse it,--the Duke being kept near London,--where we
had not forces enough, wee resolved to serve ourselves with the Lady
Elizabeth.
* * * * *
_J._ The names of other principall persons that were made privie
afterwards to this horrible conspiracie.
[_Signed_] GUIDO FAUKES.
Everard Digby, Knight
Ambrose Ruckwood
Francis Tresham
John Grant
Robert [Keys] _Wynter_
[_Witnessed_] Edw. Coke W. Waad.
[_Endorsed_] Fawkes his [deposition] _declaration 17 Nov.
1605_.[473]
FOOTNOTES:
[468] Alterations and additions (in italics) made by Sir Edward Coke.
[469] This name has seemingly been tampered with.
[470] Changed by Cecil; but on November 14th, writing to Edmondes, he
included Keyes amongst those that "wrought not in the myne," and R.
Winter amongst those who did.
[471] Interlined.
[472] The words italicised are added in the published version.
[473] Words in italics added by Coke.
INDEX.
Abbot, Robert, Bishop of Salisbury, his version of the missing
confessions of Faukes, 192 _seq._
Acton, Robert, 113.
Alabaster, Thomas, a priest in government employ, 204 _note_.
Andrew, William, servant to Sir E. Digby, evidence of, 78 _note_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account