What Will He Do with It? — CompleteLytton, Edward Bulwer Lytton, Baron
General
What Will He Do with It? — Complete
Lytton, Edward Bulwer Lytton, Baron
English fiction -- 19th century
contrived to be a minor, who came of age just in time to take the oaths
of fealty to William and Mary. In case of accidents, the House of Vipont
kept on friendly terms with the exiled Stuarts, but it wrote no letters,
and got into no scrapes. It was not, however, till the Government, under
Sir Robert Walpole, established the constitutional and parliamentary
system which characterizes modern freedom, that the puissance
accumulated through successive centuries by the House of Vipont became
pre-eminently visible. By that time its lands were vast; its wealth
enormous; its parliamentary influence, as “a Great House,” was a part of
the British Constitution. At this period, the House of Vipont found it
convenient to rend itself into two grand divisions,--the peer’s branch
and the commoner’s. The House of Commons had become so important that it
was necessary for the House of Vipont to be represented there by a great
commoner. Thus arose the family of Carr Vipont. That division, owing
to a marriage settlement favouring a younger son by the heiress of the
Carrs, carried off a good slice from the estate of the earldom: _uno
averso, non deficit alter_; the earldom mourned, but replaced the loss
by two wealthy wedlocks of its own; and had long since seen cause to
rejoice that its power in the Upper Chamber was strengthened by such aid
in the Lower. For, thanks to its parliamentary influence, and the aid
of the great commoner, in the reign of George III. the House of Vipont
became a Marquess. From that time to the present day, the House of
Vipont has gone on prospering and progressive. It was to the aristocracy
what the “Times” newspaper is to the press. The same quick sympathy
with public feeling, the same unity of tone and purpose, the same
adaptability, and something of the same lofty tone of superiority to the
petty interests of party. It may be conceded that the House of Vipont
was less brilliant than the “Times” newspaper, but eloquence and wit,
necessary to the duration of a newspaper, were not necessary to that of
the House of Vipont. Had they been so, it would have had them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account