England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century; Great Britain -- History -- William IV, 1830-1837
On April 8th, between midnight and one a.m., the statue of King
William III. on College Green, Dublin, was blown up by gunpowder. The
street for some time previously had been quiet, none but the ordinary
passengers being apparent, when a watchman saw a lighted train burning
upwards towards the figure; he endeavoured to drag it down with his
pole, but did not succeed. A second watchman came up, and told him to
come away, for there was powder in it. This latter man, who warned his
companion, had previously seen an attempt made to blow up the statue,
but it had failed; and, fearing the danger, gave the warning.
Immediately after the watchmen withdrew, a tremendous explosion
occurred, as loud as a piece of artillery. The noise was heard all
over the neighbourhood. Most of the gas-lamps from the College to
Trinity Street were blown out, and the figure, weighty as it was,
being composed of nearly solid lead, and nine or ten feet high, was
thrown several feet in the air, and fell on the southern side of the
base.
It may be remembered that, in 1835, the Hon. C. Berkeley moved the
admission of ladies to the gallery of the House of Commons. A select
committee was appointed to consider the subject, and their report was
presented and read on May 3rd. As the debate thereon was short, and
somewhat amusing, I give some of the principal speeches _in extenso_.
"The Hon. C. Berkeley said that he now brought this question, for
the second time, under the consideration of the House, because he
was perfectly convinced that his motion would have been carried
last session, if many friends of the measure had not happened to
have been in the House at the time. (Laughter.) The Committee,
who had agreed to the report which had just been read, had been
fairly chosen, and they had considered how the object could be
attained at the least possible expense; and, for his own part, he
could not see why ladies should not be admitted, when they were
placed in such a situation that they could not interfere in the
debate. (Great laughter.) It had been said that the presence of
ladies during the debates would distract the attention of
honourable members, although he must confess that if the ladies
were in the House it would make no difference in his thoughts.
(Loud and continued laughter.) Perhaps some gentlemen, at least,
who were made of so much more inflammable materials (shouts of
laughter) might be so affected. The ladies were once admitted to
that gallery, and the debates were not prolonged then, though it
was now the fashion to say that the debates would be prolonged if
they were admitted, and that many persons who were not now in the
habit of speaking would be generally getting up to address the
House when the ladies were present; but, on the other hand, he
believed there were many who spoke much more for the papers than
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account