England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century; Great Britain -- History -- William IV, 1830-1837
Yet one more case of ignorance and prejudice--which occurred in the
House of Commons, on March 25th, when the report of the Committee of
Supply was brought up. On the question that the House do agree with
the Committee in the resolution that a sum not exceeding £16,884 be
granted to his Majesty for the expenses of the establishment of the
British Museum--
"Mr. Cobbett rose to object to the resolution. He saw no reason
why the sum of £16,000 should be paid out of the general taxes of
the country for the sake of supporting the British Museum. In
former times, when Mr. Bankes superintended the expenditure of
the British Museum, the grant to it did not exceed £10,000. Then
he thought the grant unjust, and now he could not imagine why, in
the present distressed condition of the country, it should be
raised to £16,000: for when was the British Museum of the
slightest use to the country at large? Last year there was £1000
paid for a collection of insects; what use could that collection
be of to the weavers of Lancashire, or to the farmers and
tradesmen of distant parts of the country? The plain fact was
that the British Museum was of no use at all! It was a place to
which curious persons went to entertain themselves, by gratifying
their curiosity, and in which the rich were accustomed to lounge
away their time at the expense of their poorer countrymen. For
his own part, he did not know where the British Museum was (much
laughter), and was not acquainted with its contents. He thought
that this sum of £16,000, granted by the Committee, was just
£16,000 thrown away for the gratification of a set of loungers,
who had first taken care to get enough out of the taxes to enable
them to lounge away the rest of their lives in complete idleness.
He also objected to this grant because there was £10,000 of it,
and more, paid away in salaries, and to whom? If a list of the
parties to whom those salaries were paid were laid upon the table
of the House--and he would undertake to say that it should
shortly be laid there--it would be found that they were paid away
to the aristocracy and their dependents. He would move for a
list of those who received them." (Several voices: "The list is
published already.") "Who, he should like to know, were the maids
who swept out the rooms of the British Museum? Doubtless they
were the daughters of the head officers of the establishment. He
would say that a more scandalous job than this grant never
disgraced this Government, and that was saying a great deal.
(Laughter.) He should conclude by moving that this report be
recommitted."
Of course no one was on his side, and the grant was passed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account