Historical fiction; United States -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775 -- Fiction
A few strange years ago I walked on a quicksand, in a fog. Then it never
occurred to me that the seeming certainties were a quicksand, the
visions of Heaven a fog of fantasy. Am I any more likely to sink or
stray, now that I know it? Proposition concluded _pro tem_.
As for Hell--_Open up, old rat-hole! I may wish to spit._
"Ben," said Reuben, "do be a good boy and eat your bacon."
"Mm," said Ben, and smiled, and ate it.
Kate's unnatural silence was like a crying. Reuben made a private note
to find out, if possible, what ailed her. The dregs of his coffee were
still good for a bit more lingering.
You could not--in simple nature you could not listen to all the
surrounding voices explaining and re-explaining, accusing, justifying,
probing, forever contradicting one another and seldom pausing for an
answer. You could heed only a few. Which ones? How to choose?
Love will choose some of the few, the nearest and surely the most
important (including Kate). (_The most important, why? Query noted, for
future consideration._) Caution will select a few that must be heard,
for reasons of safety and self-defense. And some will be chosen by
native curiosity, which Mr. Welland described last Saturday as one of
the rarest of all virtues.
Other voices speak outside the region of individual contact, some of
them urgent. _Micrographia_; the old voice of Hakluyt if only because
Ben loves it; Scripture, if only because the world is so obsessed with
its thunderings; many others--even Ovid. Mr. Welland spoke of the
dramatist Shakespeare; Uncle John has one volume of him--_note: find and
percontate, immed._ These voices are not altogether unlike the near
ones--more methodical, because the pen, unlike the voice, need not move
in dizzy haste to get everything said before someone interrupts; more
methodical and not so much given to hemming and hawing and
conversational fluff; but these voices too are engaged in explaining and
re-explaining, commanding, blurred sometimes in flurries of
contradiction. Sometimes (Michael Wigglesworth for example) they sound
downright embarrassed and peevish, when the stubborn universe they speak
of is so plainly not as they describe it.
Since not all voices may be attended, since some of them lie and many
more speak loudly in the absence of knowledge, one must wait, Reuben
guessed, for the sudden inner waking, the unsought recognition, the
mind's clear declaration: This voice--(_Why did you say to me, "Run,
boy! Run!"--why?_)--this voice is speaking not merely out of some
other's need to assert, but speaking to _me_, and I understand what it
says--some of it....
If we create the present by living it, then right and wrong are
man-made. I will accept the verdicts of others in this matter if they
seem reasonable to me, and just--not otherwise.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account