William Cobbett: A Biography in Two Volumes, Vol. 1Smith, Edward
History
William Cobbett: A Biography in Two Volumes, Vol. 1
Smith, Edward
Cobbett, William 1763-1835
This was too much. Aristocratic and plutocratic animosity had been
growing fast enough, and would have been harmless, even with the aid
of Mr. Sheridan’s gay disingenuousness; but now, this was too much for
the journalists who were struggling (where they were not subsidized)
for ministerial favour. So they echo Mr. Sheridan, and return to the
charge; the _True Briton_ going a little farther than is needed, and
indicating the appropriate punishment:--
“Mr. Windham professes himself to be the _Soldier’s Friend_.
We cannot suppose, however, that his attachment to a certain
_American scribbler_ arises from his being the writer of a work
at the beginning of the French Revolution, bearing that title,
because that work had for its object _to excite the soldiery
to mutiny_,--to which, it seems, the same patriotic writer now
endeavours _to instigate the navy_. We speak merely from what
has been said in the House of Commons, for we think no true
Briton can read the works of the person alluded to with any
kind of temper. The _pillory_ or the _gibbet_ we think a more
appropriate reward than that which Mr. Windham has suggested
for a writer of such a stamp.”
Now, all through Mr. Cobbett’s long life, there was nothing roused his
ire so much (in the way of personality) as the charge of sedition; and
all through his life he was justified in repudiating it. It was not his
way. He was a man for facing his adversaries. And, to the end of his
days, whatever his other errors, he could never be reproached with the
arts of covert warfare. So Mr. Cobbett was nettled; and,--
“in less than three hours after the libel was published, the
libeller, Mr. Heriot, received personal chastisement in the
very apartment where he had fabricated the libel.”
The reader, who may feel interested in the full details of this
squabble, will find Heriot’s version in the _True Briton_ of August
15-22, and Mr. Cobbett’s account in the _Political Register_ for August
20, 1803. It is sufficient to record here, that Mr. Heriot brought an
action for assault, and did not appear to prosecute; and that “focus of
accumulated infamy, the _Political Register_,” went on its way.
* * * * *
Just before the above incident occurred, circumstances had led to the
production of an article in Cobbett’s _Register_, which should now be
mentioned, as indicating, probably, the extremest point of time at
which he gave uncompromising support to the Government.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account