William Cobbett: A Biography in Two Volumes, Vol. 1Smith, Edward
History
William Cobbett: A Biography in Two Volumes, Vol. 1
Smith, Edward
Cobbett, William 1763-1835
“… I am happy to think that I am likely to be of some use in
uniting men in support of the throne, the Church, and the
real liberties of the people, against the conspirators of
loan-makers and directors, directors of all sorts, I mean; East
India as well as Bank … whether I shall draw them out at last I
know not. I wish I may. But they have now such a load to toil
against, that I am apt to think they will desist, and by-and-by
glance at my present writing as a proof of my disaffection and
abandonment of principle. If it please God to give me health,
that shall not serve them, though. Pray keep a good look-out,
for, if they say only a word, I wish to meet it instantly.”
* * * * *
“… Is it really true that the cowards have given up Malta?
Why, they went to war for Malta! ‘Malta,’ said Dundas, in his
villainous brogue, ‘Malta! Malta! en parpatooaty, es tha trewly
Breetush oabjuct of ware!’ And now he gives it up! For God’s
sake look at his speech, _Reg._, vol. iii. p. 1662. But be sure
not to talk of it to any one, as I should then be anticipated.”
* * * * *
“… Have you seen Reeves? I think I must come to a plain
understanding with him; for I hate cold half-friendships. I
think my two last numbers must have staggered such people.”
Mr. Cobbett is in town in November to attend Judge Johnson’s trial; but
he is at Botley House again in January. Mr. Wright pays them another
visit, too, having been desired to bring a fine large twelfth-cake,
also “the portfolio with all the boys’ pictures in it.”
* * * * *
That some people were getting “staggered,” as Cobbett says, is by no
means unlikely. He has been publicly called upon to “defend himself
from the charge of not having joined the opponents of Sir Francis
Burdett;” when, lo! it is discovered that an acknowledgment must be
made, of at least some claim, on the part of the latter, to represent
the Middlesex constituency, as against his opponent:--
“The former sentiments and expressions of Sir Francis Burdett
were not, for the most part, so wrong in themselves as in the
season of their application. Some of them, indeed, were such
as no time or place would justify.… His language, and many of
his acts, during the former election, as well as previous to
it, were seditious to a degree bordering upon treason; they
did, in my opinion, totally incapacitate him as a member of
Parliament.… He chose to disgrace himself and his cause by an
appeal to the worst passions of the worst part of the people.
But if nothing of a seditious nature has appeared in the
conduct of Sir Francis Burdett since that election, upon what
principle will his opponents justify their resentment against
him, whilst they are so ready to overlook the political sins of
others?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account