William Cobbett: A Biography in Two Volumes, Vol. 2Smith, Edward
History
William Cobbett: A Biography in Two Volumes, Vol. 2
Smith, Edward
Cobbett, William 1763-1835
The libel was a work which no well-disposed mind could doubt to
have been framed for the most pernicious objects. Looking at
the time at which it was written--looking at the circumstances
of the world--there could be no doubt of the evil intentions
of the paper. The whole tendency of it was, in so many words,
to excite unwillingness and dislike to the service of the
country, amongst those who are to be its defence, and to
insult those foreigners who are in our service, to deprive
the country of their honourable assistance, and to paralyze
the energies of the State. The objects of the libel were too
palpable for doubt, &c.… “The jury found you, William Cobbett,
guilty, upon the fullest and most satisfactory evidence. If
it were to be allowed, that your object was not to enfeeble
and embarrass the operations of Government, there can be no
ground for exculpating you from the guilt of libelling, for the
base and degrading object of making a stipend by your crime.
If there had been no other imputation upon you, the Court, as
protecting the purity and peace of the public mind, would have
felt itself called on to punish you severely. It is strange
that a man who mixes so much in general and private life, as
you do, should not see that such acts, as those for which you
have been tried, are only productive of mischief to every mind
that is influenced by them; and that they necessarily terminate
in punishment on the guilty authors. It is strange that
experience should not have taught you, and that you should be
only advancing in a continual progress of malignity. What were
the circumstances which you distorted in your libel? the whole
intention of which was to throw disgrace on the Government, and
to disgust and alienate the army. If you had anything to offer
in extenuation, you might have offered it; the Court would
have received it; and, at all events, impartial justice would
have been dealt to you. I now pass the sentence of the Court
upon you, William Cobbett, as the principal criminal amongst
those who now stand before the Court: the Court do accordingly
adjudge that you, William Cobbett, pay to our Lord the King
a fine of 1000_l._; that you be imprisoned in His Majesty’s
gaol of Newgate for the space of two years, and that at the
expiration of that time, you enter into a recognizance to keep
the peace for seven years--yourself in the sum of 3000_l._, and
two good and sufficient sureties in the sum of 1000_l._ each;
and further, that you be imprisoned till that recognizance be
entered into, and that fine paid.”
Mr. Hansard was then sentenced to three months’ imprisonment in the
King’s Bench, and to enter into recognizances for three years. Mr. Budd
and Mr. Bagshaw were each sent to the same prison for a period of two
months.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account