Historians -- United States -- Biography; Prescott, William Hickling, 1796-1859
"A more delicate duty remains,--to speak freely of an American
whose success in the field of literature has raised him to the
highest rank. His talents have not only immortalised himself--they
have added a new charm to the subject of his histories. He showed
his faith by the expenditure of a fortune at the commencement of
his enterprise, in the purchase of books and Mss. relating to
'America of the Spaniards.' These were the materials out of which
he framed his two histories of the two aboriginal empires, Mexico
and Peru. At the time these works were written he could not have
had the remotest idea of the circumstances under which his Spanish
authorities had been produced, or of the external pressure that
gave them their peculiar form and character. He could hardly
understand that peculiar organisation of Spanish society through
which one set of opinions might be uniformly expressed in public,
while the intellectual classes in secret entertain entirely
opposite ones. He acted throughout in the most perfect good faith;
and if, on a subsequent scrutiny, his authorities have proved to be
the fabulous creations of Spanish-Arabian fancy, he is not in
fault. They were the standards when he made use of them--a
sufficient justification of his acts. 'This beautiful world we
inhabit,' said an East Indian philosopher, 'rests on the back of a
mighty elephant; the elephant stands on the back of a monster
turtle; the turtle rests upon a serpent; and the serpent on
nothing.' Thus stand the literary monuments Mr. Prescott has
constructed. They are castles resting upon a cloud which reflects
an eastern sunrise upon a western horizon."
This book appeared in the year of Prescott's death, and he himself made
no published comment on it. A very sharp notice, however, was written
by some one who did not sign his name, but who was undoubtedly very near
to Prescott.[42] The writer of this notice had little difficulty in
showing that Wilson was a very slipshod investigator; that he was in
many respects ignorant of the very authorities whom he attempted to
refute; and that as a writer he was very crude indeed. Some portions of
this paper may be quoted, mainly because they sum up such of Mr.
Wilson's points as were in reality important. The first paragraph has
also a somewhat personal interest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account