William Jay and the Constitutional Movement for the Abolition of SlaveryTuckerman, Bayard
History
William Jay and the Constitutional Movement for the Abolition of Slavery
Tuckerman, Bayard
Antislavery movements -- United States; Jay, William, 1789-1858; United States -- Politics and government -- 1815-1861
"It cannot be necessary to dwell on the vast importance of an
explicit declaration by your board on this subject. Independent of
the deep concern I feel in the harmony, integrity, and consistency
of the abolition party, I have a personal interest in the inquiry I
now make of you. An _enlarged_ edition of my book is ready for the
press, but the late resolution of your society compels me to suspend
its publication. I had treated the charge that abolitionists desired
Congress to interfere with slavery in the States as calumnious, and
in refutation of it had appealed to their solemn disclaimers. I need
not say, sir, that until the late resolution is satisfactorily
explained, or its doctrine disavowed by your society, I cannot in my
new edition deny the charge, but must as an honest man substitute
for my confident assertions and triumphant appeals most painful and
humiliating confessions. Permit me to suggest that it is highly
desirable that your board should act explicitly on this subject
before the meeting of the American Antislavery Society, that, if
possible, no inquiries or investigation may then arise to mar the
harmony of the meeting and retard the progress of abolition.
"I flatter myself, sir, that your sentiments on the constitutional
question remain the same as when you signed the address of 1835, and
that you comprehend and appreciate the motives which have prompted
this letter. I shall await your answer with extreme anxiety."
On receipt of this letter Mr. Loring communicated with a number of the
members of the board of managers and endeavoured to hold a meeting of
the board for the purpose of rescinding or repudiating the resolution;
but it was not until the 14th that he succeeded in getting a quorum
together. After Mr. Loring had read Judge Jay's letter to the board,
they promptly passed the following resolution:
"_Resolved_, That as said resolution was submitted to the meeting
just at its close, when but few delegates were present, and was
adopted without deliberation or discussion, this board recommend its
reconsideration at the next quarterly meeting of the society.
_"Resolved_, As the sense of this board, that Congress has no power
to abolish slavery in the several States of this Union."
In a letter dated the 15th of March, enclosing a copy of the above
resolution, Mr. Loring said: "I can hear of but one or two persons here
who believe in the power of Congress over slavery in the States, viz.,
the Misses Grimke, Mr. Alanson St. Clair, and perhaps Mr. May and Mrs.
Chapman. Several, however, and those influential persons (Mr. Garrison
among them), think slavery unconstitutional, and believe it would be so
pronounced by the Supreme Court of the United States if the point should
ever be made. In this opinion I can by no means agree."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account