Female friendship -- Fiction; London (England) -- Fiction
“It is. I wanted, if possible, to write something even more imbecile
than has ever yet been written. I have not the patience for great
length; nor the wit for brilliant satire; nor the imagination for the
popular, spicy, impossible, ill-flavoured romance; so I have chosen the
other line, adopted by the great majority, and aim at purposeless,
pointless imbecility.”
“And is Hal the model for your heroine?” asked Hermon.
When Hal’s indignation and epithets had subsided, Quin remarked that he
supposed the book fairly bristled with mothers, and with paragraphs of
good advice to them.
“Well, yes,” Dick admitted. “There are certainly a good many
mothers—far more mothers than wives, in fact.”
“Oh, naughty!” put in Lord Denton.
“Not at all. It has to do with a theory. It is to bring out the common
sense of vegetables compared to humans. Humans condemn millions of
women, specially born for motherhood, to purposeless, joyless
spinsterhood, all on account of a prejudice. No green, brainless,
commonplace vegetable would be guilty of such unutterable folly as
that.”
“Don’t be too sweeping,” quoth Quin. “In the East End women are still
mothers from choice; and given decent, healthy conditions, they would
proudly raise an army to protect their country from her threatening
foes. It is not their fault that 50 per cent of their offspring are
sickly, anaemic little weeds.”
“It sounds as if your book has a serious side in spite of its
imbecility?” suggested Lorraine.
“Imbecility and madness are usually full of seriousness,” Dick told
her—“far more so than commonplace rationalism.”
“And do you want to revolutionise society?”
“Oh dear no; what an alarming idea!”
“Then what do you want?”—they asked him.
“I want to see all the superfluous unemployed spinsters busy, happy
mothers, patriotically contributing to raise a splendid fighting-force,
for one thing, which will certainly be regarded as an utterly imbecile
idea by a magnificently rational world.”
“And have you any theory about it?” asked Lord Denton.
“Nothing but the worn-out, commonplace, absurdly natural theories of
the vegetable and animal kingdoms. My only chance is that, being so
ancient, and so absurdly natural, the modern world may mistake them for
something entirely new, and seize upon them with the fasionable avidity
for novelties.”
“Or they may lock you up,” suggested Quin.
“In any case I’m afraid you’ll be too late,” Hal commented, with a half
grave, half sarcastic air; “for before your theories can make any
headway, England is likely to have given all her life-blood to systems,
and restrictions, and cut-and-dried conventions, utterly regardless of
her need for a strong protecting force to maintain her existence at
all. Taken in the aggregate, she never has bothered much about the
primary necessity for the best possible conditions for the mothers of
the future.”
“What a learned sentence, Hal,” put in Lorraine, looking amused. “Quite
worthy of a militant suffragette.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account