Witchcraft of New England Explained by Modern SpiritualismPutnam, Allen
Religion
Witchcraft of New England Explained by Modern Spiritualism
Putnam, Allen
Spiritualism; Witchcraft -- New England
We have already substantially said that the blinding, infuriating, and
bloodthirsty beliefs of former days are perhaps in no case more distinctly
and deplorably manifested than in the lawless, barbarous treatment to
which good Rebecca Nurse was subjected by a court and people who sought to
do, and believed that they were doing, acceptable service to God, or, at
least, offensive service to the devil. Spectral evidence against her, and
that alone, was allowed to outweigh the merits of a long and beneficent
life. The jury first brought her in _not_ guilty. This verdict, surprising
the court, induced it to express apprehension that the jurors had not
given due weight to certain expressions which the prisoner had uttered;
whereupon _the jury itself requested permission_ to retire and hold
further deliberation; and even such a privilege was granted them! They
retired, reversed their verdict, pronounced her _guilty_, and she was
sentenced to be hanged. Afterward the governor of the province granted her
reprieve; and yet he soon revoked his own clement act. Probably neither
jury, nor the governor, was convinced that she was guilty of the crime
charged; nevertheless, both were forced by popular demand to let the
reputation and life of this eminently good woman fall a sacrifice before
infatuation and frenzy which the erroneous creed of the times engendered.
MARY EASTY,
a woman of strong character, good common sense, and capable of
comprehending both the dangers besetting any one then accused of
witchcraft, and also the purport and bearings of such questions as the
court was accustomed to ask, is presented in the following account.
"The examination of Mary Easty, at a court held at Salem Village,
April 22, 1692, by the Wop. John Hathorne and Jonathan Corwin.
"At the bringing in of the accused, several fell into fits. 'Doth
this woman hurt you?' Many mouths were stopt, and several other fits
seized them. Abigail Williams said it was Goody Easty, and she had
hurt her; the like said Mary Walcot and Ann Putnam. John Jackson said
he saw her with Goody Hobbs.
"'What do you say; are you guilty?' _Ans._ 'I can say before Jesus
Christ I am free.' _Response._ 'You see these accuse you.' _Ans._
'There is a God.'
"'Hath she brought the book to you (the accusing girls)?' Their months
were stopt.
"'What have you done to these children?' _Ans._ 'I know nothing.'
"'How can you say you know nothing, when you see these tormented and
accuse you?' _Ans._ 'Would you have me accuse myself?' 'Yes, if you be
guilty. How far have you complied with Satan whereby he takes this
advantage of you?'
"'Sir, I never complied: but prayed against him all my days. I have no
compliance with Satan in this. What would you have me do?'
"'Confess, if you be guilty.'
"'I will say it, if it was my last time: I am clear of this sin.'
"'Of what sin?'
"'Of witchcraft.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account