India. Army; World War, 1914-1918 -- Campaigns -- Western Front; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- India
Imagine a cold winter’s day in Flanders; a biting wind, perhaps snow
falling, and a hundred odd, unwilling and unfit reservists from the
tropics, standing shivering. The sound of the guns was more or less
incessant; overhead passed one or more aeroplanes; an occasional burst
from an anti-aircraft gun gave colour to the scene, and you have a
picture of more than one inspection of reservists I carried out. It was
unfair to the men themselves, still more to the Corps, and most unfair
to those who had to include them in their ranks and show a battle
strength of so many hundred men on paper.
Of course these remarks apply chiefly to reservists, and some other
drafts; there was the other side of the picture. Whole double companies
occasionally arrived from other battalions, splendid fighting material
and glad to be with us; and although this meant weakening the units they
came from, that was another story with which we could not concern
ourselves. As time wore on, India found it necessary to fill our gaps as
far as was possible from all classes and parts of the country. There
were at times in a single battalion men collected from nine to eleven
different units, and to those who know the Army, its composition and its
regimental system, it will be very evident how impossible it became to
keep battalions to a proper standard. Had this been the case with the
Indian ranks alone, the British and Indian officers could have worked
great changes, but these had themselves disappeared in large numbers and
been replaced by newcomers, some with a little and many without any
experience whatever of the classes they were posted to.
Towards the end of January a question was raised as to the reduction of
British officers in Indian battalions. I was surprised to receive a
letter through G.H.Q. asking if this could not be done. Considering our
losses in officers and the absolute necessity of keeping these up to at
least the number then fixed, viz. twelve combatants per unit, I found no
difficulty in proving that not only was no reduction possible, but if
efficiency was to be maintained an increase was necessary. I presume the
suggestion was only made owing to the great shortage that then existed
and the difficulty of finding replacements, but there was no question as
to the answer, more especially as I was well aware that a great number
of Indian Army officers were being employed on Staff duties in England
or with the New Armies then in course of formation.
During the winter months I received several letters from General Sir
Dighton Probyn. He of course took the greatest interest in the Indians,
and in one he said to me, “I wish I could reverse the figures of my age
and make myself twenty-eight instead of eighty-two. I would then beg of
you to take me as anything, trooper or mounted orderly,” and added that
the shirkers would have a miserable existence to the end of their days,
after the war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account