India. Army; World War, 1914-1918 -- Campaigns -- Western Front; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- India
On the 2nd March I dined with Lord Kitchener; the only other person
present was Colonel FitzGerald and he left immediately dinner was
finished. I had the benefit of a very long talk with the great
Field-Marshal, and some of this I will relate for it is of great
interest. The chief point he dealt with was the shortage of shells and
the necessity for economising ammunition in the field. He urged me to
let it be quietly known to my senior officers that it was criminal to
waste a single round; he said all would be well in due course but at
that time he could not possibly supply the wants. He particularly
pointed out that what we called “registering” and what he called
“shooting into the mist” must be limited to absolute necessity alone. I
was much impressed by this insistence on economy of gun power, and his
clear assurance that we might find ourselves without shells unless this
warning was observed. He made no mystery of it, and as I was leaving
urged me once more to do all in my power to keep down the expenditure
both of ammunition and money. “Each individual can help in his own
degree,” were his parting words. I knew, of course, we were very short
of shells, but after what he said I was more than surprised long
afterwards when I read that he had not let this be understood.
Another subject which Lord Kitchener discussed was the question of
compulsory service. He was entirely in favour of it, but said his great
difficulty lay in the fact that he knew he would never get a fair
chance. “They will exempt hundreds of thousands in what are called
indispensable positions and will only leave me the chaff.” I suggested
that if he once told the country he must have the men, would he not get
them; and he replied, “You little know all I shall have to fight
against. I do.” Judging by all the wrangling that went on before
compulsory service became a reality, his words sound prophetic now.
Regarding the Indians he spoke very fully. He did not say it in so many
words, but his meaning was quite clear, and that was that whoever might
try and get rid of them, he meant to keep an Indian Corps in France in
name at least, if not in numbers, but that he would entirely relieve
units as they dwindled, and replace them from Egypt and elsewhere. At a
subsequent interview I had with him four months later he put this very
forcibly and gave his reasons, as I shall tell.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account