India. Army; World War, 1914-1918 -- Campaigns -- Western Front; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- India
Throughout this day the Dehra Dun Brigade had been subjected to constant
shell-fire and suffered considerably. Whilst this delay was being
caused, some platoons of the 4th Seaforths rose up and doubled forward,
and in doing so had to pass through a heavy machine-gun fire, but
nothing ever dismayed that gallant Corps, which was reported by the
Brigadier as advancing during the battle “with a confidence and
self-reliance that left little to be desired.”
The C.O., Lieut.-Colonel MacFarlane, and the Second in Command, Major
Cuthbert, were both severely wounded. I can see them now as I first saw
them in France: two gallant gentlemen who at once gave me the impression
of being real “cool-headed Scots,” who would enjoy nothing more than a
tough scrap with a good few Boches.
I will revert to the Bareilly Brigade, which, as already narrated, was
holding our original front trenches, and had divided their line into two
sub-sections. Before the opening of the battle, advanced picquets had
been withdrawn and all houses in the Rue du Bois evacuated, in case they
should be shelled by the enemy. The main line of defences had been fully
manned, and Brigade reserves were in position by 4 A.M. on the morning
of 10th March.
Port Arthur was evacuated by the garrison for the period of our obstacle
and wire-cutting bombardment, but rifle and machine-gun fire was
maintained. A German aeroplane which had made an early trip over our
lines had spotted the gathering of troops, and shortly after a rain of
shells was poured into the redoubt, and caused many casualties. The
Leicesters and 1/39th suffered somewhat severely, and the 2nd Black
Watch also had over thirty.
Communication trenches to connect our own line with the captured German
works had been pushed forward, and three companies of the 4th Black
Watch moved up to take over the _points d’appui_ which were being
established. Shortly afterwards this battalion was withdrawn, but it
reads strangely, in the light of after events, that “it was found
difficult to keep proper communication with this unit as it had no
telephone equipment.”
I must digress a moment. “No telephone equipment!” Think of it, those
who later on fought so bravely but under what different conditions. The
Indian battalions at least had their ordinary equipment, though at first
on a very meagre scale, and if we owed nothing else to the parsimony of
the Indian Government in connection with all things militant, we
nevertheless owed them one debt of gratitude, and that was, that perhaps
of all the troops in the field in France during the winter of 1914–15,
the Indian Corps felt least the lack of necessaries, simply because it
never realised that a shortage existed; for when things were at their
very lowest ebb they still were in excess of anything we had been
accustomed to in India, even in our palmiest and most festal Durbar
days.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account