With the movie makersStearns, Myron M. (Myron Morris)
General
With the movie makers
Stearns, Myron M. (Myron Morris)
Motion pictures -- Juvenile literature
Naturally, each distributing company tries to get the best salesmen it
can, even if it has to pay salaries of hundreds of dollars a week for
them. Because a good salesman, selling even a poor picture, may get a
lot more money for it for his distributing company than a poor salesman
would be able to get for a better picture.
Now let us see how these things work out.
A dozen or more big distributing companies, blanketing the whole
country, each trying to sell the pictures it is handling to the
greatest possible number of the fifteen thousand exhibitors for the
best possible price. Not to the _audiences_, mind you; that is the
exhibitors’ look-out; the distributors are not trying to sell pictures
to the people who sit in rows and look at them—at least, not directly.
They are selling them to _exhibitors_.
Along comes a picture producer who has made, perhaps, an excellent
picture of ordinary, everyday people just like you and me. Along comes
another producer who has made a picture that isn’t half so good or
as true to life—but it cost more money to make, or it has some
spectacular sets in it, or it is based on some novel that had a big
sale, or it has a catchy title, or a well-known star, or is made from
a popular play. The distributor takes it and _turns the better picture
down_, because it will be easier to sell the picture with the “talking
points” to the exhibitors! Audiences may not like it as well as they
would the other, better picture—but it will be easier to make the
exhibitor “bite” on it! See?
[Illustration: _Courtesy Assoc. First Nat’l Exhibitors, Inc._
A TÊTE-À-TÊTE WITH A LION.
Note that the lioness is looking not at the actress opposite her, but
at the motion-picture camera that annoys her with its clicking.]
[Illustration: _Courtesy Assoc. First Nat’l Exhibitors, Inc._
ACTING WITH A “TAME” LION.
There is always enough danger in playing “opposite” a lion to make it
easy for any actor to “register fear.” Note how the lion is baring
his teeth.]
There, in a nutshell, is one of the big difficulties that anybody who
wants to help along the moving-picture industry, either by making
better pictures or by encouraging better pictures, is up against.
Between the public on the one side and the big distributors and
producers on the other side stand the exhibitors, who must be “sold” on
a money-making basis, before any great change can come about.
In the long run, to be sure, audience value counts. In the long run you
and Andrew McGinnis and George Lenox and Fuller Westcott have to be
satisfied with the pictures you see, or you will quit going to see what
your local exhibitor-man has to offer. But remember, that’s _in the
long run_.
Now, with this explanation of what a good picture has to overcome to
find its way into the movie palaces, let us see how good it can be, and
still “get by.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account