Families -- Fiction; Man-woman relationships -- Fiction; New York (N.Y.) -- History -- 19th century -- Fiction
At last the serpent began to move its glittering head. The Grand
Marshal, General Hopkins, set forth with a retinue of generals and
aids, guards and riflemen. The horse artillery and various guard
regiments followed with seven brass bands. The second division under
Major General Stryker consisted of the Governor and his staff, the
state artillery, State Fencibles and cadets, councilmen from various
cities, foreign consuls, and members of the Society of the Cincinnati,
escorting the water commissioners and engineers, all in barouches. The
third division included officers of the army and navy and militia,
“reverend the clergy,” judges, lawyers, professors, and students; the
chamber of commerce and the board of trade. The firemen made up the
fourth division. Four other divisions tailed after.
It seemed that there could be nobody left to watch when so many
marched. But the walks and windows, porches and roofs were a living
plaster of heads and bodies. New York had more than doubled its
numbers since the Erie Canal festival and had now nearly three hundred
and fifty thousand souls within its bounds, as well as thousands on
thousands of visitors.
It gave RoBards’ heart another twinge to stand an obscure member of a
fire-gang and watch Harry Chalender go by in a carriage as one of the
victorious engineers.
RoBards had fought him and his ambitions and must haul on a rope now
like a harnessed Roman captive, while his victor triumphed past him in
a chariot, or, worse, a barouche.
Life had defeated RoBards again and again. With the loftiest motives
he had been always the loser, and he could not understand things.
Chalender was a flippant fencer with life; yet somehow he fought always
on the winning side and the worthier side. His mortal offense had been
condoned, outlawed, and the offended ones helped to conceal his guilt.
It was bitter for an earnest man like RoBards to go afoot after such a
rake as Chalender. Why should he have killed and hidden Jud Lasher in a
wall, and let Harry Chalender, who had been as evil, ride by in state
showered with the cheers due a hero, a savior of New York?
RoBards would never cease to shudder lest it be found out that he had
spared Chalender; and he would never cease to shudder lest it be found
out that he had punished Jud Lasher. A jury would probably acquit him
for killing Lasher, but only if he exculpated himself by publishing
the disaster that had befallen Immy. If he had killed Chalender and
published his wife’s frailty, a jury would have acquitted him for
that, too. But why should it have befallen him to be compelled to such
decisions and such secrecies?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account