Woman; Her Position and Influence in Ancient Greece and Rome, and Among the Early ChristiansDonaldson, James, Sir
History
Woman; Her Position and Influence in Ancient Greece and Rome, and Among the Early Christians
Donaldson, James, Sir
Women -- Greece; Women -- History -- To 500; Women -- Rome
extinguished, the honour and modesty of continency are injured, and all
its glory and dignity are profaned.” At the same time we ought to do
justice to the self-control and perseverance with which many pursued
their high ideal--for the ideal was a high one, as the purity aimed at
was not corporeal merely, but extended over the whole range of life.
“For it would be ridiculous,” says one of the virgins in Methodius, “to
preserve the lustful members pure but not the tongue, or to preserve
the tongue but neither the eyesight, the ears, nor the hands, or,
lastly, to preserve these pure but not the mind, defiling it with pride
and anger.”[162]
Such, then, was the position of women among the early Christians. We
have said nothing of Christian legislation, for we have been treating
of a period when the legislation was carried on entirely by pagans. But
we ought to mention two facts, or two phases of one fact, which had
a great effect on the destinies of mankind, but especially of woman,
and which have found their way into modern legislation. The Roman
father had absolute power of life and of death over his children in
the primitive times of Rome. Gradually this power slackened, but he
retained to the end of heathendom the right to expose his children,
and pagan sentiment supported him in such conduct. The infants, on
their birth, might be drowned or exposed to the cold air, or starved,
or abandoned to wild beasts. In this way deformed and weakly children
were left to perish. A very large number of the children who were
thus disposed of were girls. Christianity condemned this practice
from the first as murder. It went further. It was a question with
the ancients at what time the human fœtus became a living being,
and many maintained that the soul came to it only when it was born.
Tertullian has discussed this subject fully in his ‘Treatise on the
Soul.’[163] He says: “This view [that the fœtus has no soul] is
entertained by the Stoics, along with Aenesidemus, and occasionally by
Plato himself, when he tells us that the soul, being quite a separate
formation, originating elsewhere and externally to the womb, is inhaled
when the new-born infant first draws breath.” This was the opinion
prevalent among all classes of the Pagan world, and the practice was
universal and avowed of killing the fœtus by drugs. But Christianity
took the other view, that the soul came at the earliest stage, and
maintained that it was equally sinful “to take away a life that is
born, or destroy one that is coming to birth.”[164] Accordingly the
heathen practice was forbidden by the Church. The prohibition made
its appearance at an early period in Christianity, for it occurs in
the Epistle of Barnabas,[165] written about the beginning of the
second century, and we are told that Peter says in the Apocalypse (an
apocryphal writing probably of early date) “that abortive infants shall
share the better fate: that these are committed to a guardian angel, so
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account