Woman; Her Position and Influence in Ancient Greece and Rome, and Among the Early ChristiansDonaldson, James, Sir
History
Woman; Her Position and Influence in Ancient Greece and Rome, and Among the Early Christians
Donaldson, James, Sir
Women -- Greece; Women -- History -- To 500; Women -- Rome
has his Helene, Montanus his Maximilla, Apelles his Philumene, and so
in the case of other sects. One sect[128] belonging to the Montanists
deserves special notice for the energy with which it supported the
claims of women. It bore various names, such as the Quintiliani, the
Pepuziani, the Priscilliani, and the Bread-and-Cheesites because they
celebrated their mysteries with bread and cheese. They gave special
thanks to Eve because she first ate of the tree of knowledge. They
lauded the sister of Moses and the four daughters of Philip, because
they asserted the right of women to prophesy--that is, to speak in
public the message of God. Frequently in their church seven virgins,
clothed in white and bearing torches, stood up and addressed the
people, and spoke so eloquently that tears of repentance ran down the
cheeks of the audience. In this sect women held the place of bishops
and elders and deacons as well as men,[129] and they appealed to St.
Paul for their practice: for he says, “In Christ Jesus there is neither
male nor female.” It is against this sect that Tertullian, or one
assuming his name, launches his thunderbolts. “The very women,” he
says, “of these heretics how wanton they are! For they are bold enough
to teach, to dispute, to enact exorcisms, to undertake cures, it may be
even to baptize.”
In describing another sect, Epiphanius states the reasons why
women should have no priestly functions. The sect was that of the
Collyridians. Epiphanius[130] asserts that there are some who make the
Virgin God. “For they relate,” he says, “that some women in Arabia
[ἐκεῖσε, not intelligible][131], from the parts of Thrace have
introduced this new dogma, so as to offer up a cake (κολλυρίδα) to
the name of the Ever-Virgin, and assemble together and attempt--going
beyond all bounds--to perpetuate an unlawful and blasphemous deed to
the name of the Holy Virgin, and to her name to perform sacrifice
through women, which is an action entirely impious and unlawful,
alien to the preaching of the Holy Spirit; so that the whole is an
energy of the devil, and the teaching of an unclean spirit.” He then
mentions[132] that worship was paid in some places to the daughter of
Jephtha and the daughter of Pharaoh, and Thermutis, the daughter of
Amenoph, the Pharaoh, because she reared Moses. In ‘Haer.’ 79, c. i.,
he says that those who exalted Mary above humanity are none else than
women: “for the race of women is prone to slip, and is unstable and low
in their thoughts.” The thought comes from the devil, as formerly the
devil inspired Quintilla, Maximilla, and Priscilla. And he proceeds,
“For some women, adorning a curicum or four cornered seat, and covering
it with a cloth on some special day of the year, place out bread on
some days and offer it to the name of Mary; and all of them partake
of the bread, as we have already explained partially in the letter
which we wrote to Arabia.” He then refutes the heresy, the principal
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account