Women -- Employment -- United States; Women -- Social and moral questions
the scattering, haphazard kind of education then commonly bestowed upon
girls helped to bring about such a condition of things. Efficient work,
in literature as in other professions, is dependent, in a degree, upon
preparation; not indeed upon the actual amount of knowledge possessed,
but upon the training of the mind to sure action, and the vitality of
the spark of intellectual life communicated in early days. To the
desultory and aimless education of girls at this period, and their
continual servitude to the sampler, all will testify. “My education,”
says Mrs. Gilman, “was exceedingly irregular, a perpetual passing from
school to school.... I drew a very little and worked ‘The Babes in the
Wood’ on white satin, with floss silk.” By and by, however, she “was
initiated into Latin,” studied Watts’s Logic by herself, and joined a
private class in French. Lydia Huntley (Mrs. Sigourney), fared somewhat
better; pursuing mathematics, though she admits that too little time was
accorded to the subject; and being instructed in “the belles-lettres
studies” by competent teachers. Her day-school education ceased at
thirteen; she afterward worked alone over history and mental philosophy,
had tutors in Latin and French, and even dipped into Hebrew, under
clerical guidance. This has a deceptively advanced sound; we are to
learn presently that she was sent away to boarding-school, where she
applied herself to—“embroidery of historical scenes, filigree, and other
finger-works.” (May we not find a connection between this kind of
training, and the production of dramatic characters as lifelike as those
figures in floss silk? Was it not a natural result, that corresponding
“embroidery of historical scenes” performed by the feminine pen?) Lydia
Maria Francis (Mrs. Child) “apart from her brother’s companionship, had,
as usual, a very unequal share of educational opportunities; attending
only the public schools”—the public schools of the century in its
teens—“with one year at a private seminary.” She writes to the Rev.
Convers Francis in 1838, “If I possessed your knowledge, it seems to me
as if I could move the whole world. I am often amused and surprised to
think how many things I have attempted to do with my scanty stock of
learning.” Catherine Sedgwick, “reared in an atmosphere of high
intelligence,” still confesses, “I have all my life felt the want of
more systematic training.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account