Women -- Employment -- United States; Women -- Social and moral questions
The value to women of this State recognition, and of opportunity to
study at a university school, was immense. There were numerous
disadvantages due to the youth and undeveloped character of the school,
and still more to its control by a popular legislature, unversed in the
requirements of learned professions. Yet there was promise of indefinite
growth in the future, and in all the development of the future, women
might hope to share.
At first the course of instruction was limited to two years; it has
lately been extended to three; though it still has the serious defect of
demanding no thesis from students as a condition of graduation. Clinical
instruction has been necessarily inadequate in a small country town. It
has been lately proposed to transfer this part of the curriculum to
Detroit, where large hospitals furnish clinical material in abundance.
In Chicago, application to admit women was made in 1865 to the Rush
College, where Emily Blackwell had studied during the winter of 1851.
The appeal was refused.
In 1868, application was made at a rival school, the Chicago Medical
College, and was accepted. For a year female students attended the
lectures and clinics in company with young men. “The women,” observes a
Chicago writer, “were all right; but the men students were at first
embarrassed and afterwards rude. The mixed classes were therefore
abandoned, but the woman’s movement, being essentially just and
correct,”[91] was not abandoned, but led to the founding of a special
school for women in 1869.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account