Women -- Employment -- United States; Women -- Social and moral questions
Dr. Lee observed that the committee report and its concluding resolution
might be considered to read about as follows: “Whereas in the opinion of
this society, the female mind is capable of reaching every stage of
advancement to which the male mind is competent: and whereas all history
points out examples in which females have mastered every branch of
science, art and literature: _therefore_, be it resolved, that any
member of this Society who shall consult with a female physician, shall
forfeit his privileges as a member of this society.” “The resolution
completely stultifies the report.”
Nevertheless the resolution was adopted, and the County Medical Society,
notwithstanding so many internal protests, reaffirmed its former
position. The doughty little society from Montgomery then rushed to the
rescue with a counter resolution, flung at its big Philadelphia neighbor
like the pebble of David at the face of Goliath:
“Whereas the Woman’s Medical College _is_ properly organized, with an
intelligent and efficient corps of instructors, in possession of good
college buildings, and of all the appliances necessary for medical
instruction; that the students and graduates are irreproachable in
habits and character, as zealous in the pursuit of knowledge, as
intelligent and conscientious, as any of their male compeers; we hold it
to be illiberal and unworthy the high character of our profession to
withhold from them the courtesies awarded to male physicians.”—E. M.
Corson, M.D., Recording Secretary.
In 1870, the Montgomery County Society elected Dr. Anna Lukens to
membership.
In these debates the reasoning of the “opponents,” was always secretly
hampered by the lack of a definite standard with which the curriculum of
the condemned female schools could be compared. It was perfectly true
that the idea prevailed in them, that the real preparation for medical
practice was to be “picked up” by beginning to practice; and that, when
a legal diploma had once been obtained, all essential difficulties had
been removed, and the graduate could at once enter upon her “life work,”
with a light heart and assured prospects of success. But then this same
idea prevailed also in the men’s schools, that were nevertheless
recognized as perfectly “regular,” and whose graduates were readily
admitted to membership. On this account, detailed argument upon a
legitimate basis soon broke down, and resolutions were substituted which
declared the views of the Supreme Being in regard to female
physicians.[101]
The question was now transferred to the larger area of discussion in the
American Medical Association. This is a great national body, composed of
delegates from all the State societies, and meeting only once a year in
a session of three days, at different portions of the country. In 1871,
the annual meeting was held at San Francisco, and the “female physician
question” was there subjected to a long and animated debate.[102]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account