Women -- Employment -- United States; Women -- Social and moral questions
Ah, dear sir, it is largely to “mix professionally in all the nastiness
of the world which finds its way into courts of justice,” that many,
very many women seek admission to the bar. In every case involving any
one of the “unclean issues” or “collateral questions” you have named,
some woman must appear as complainant or defendant, or be in some way
associated. What more proper, then, than that some other woman should be
in court, clothed with legal power, to extend aid and protection to her
sister in trouble, that justice may be done her, and the coarse jest and
cruel laugh, so proverbial in social impurity cases before woman’s
advent as pleader, prevented! And we respectfully call upon the mothers
of every land to see to it that in no instance in the future of the
world shall a woman be summoned to the bar of justice as a party or
witness in any case involving one of these “unclean issues” or
“collateral questions” without being accompanied by one or more of her
own sex of irreproachable character. When such emergencies are otherwise
unprovided for, let the “good mothers of Israel” in the place convene
and depute one or more of their number to perform this duty. It is a
duty, unquestionably, to be performed in the interest not only of one
sex, but of mankind generally; for what affects one sex for good or
evil, affects both.
Aye, Mr. Chief Justice, “the profession enters largely into the
well-being of society”; and it is because of this fact woman desires and
ought to enter it. This is the best of reasons. As to her motherhood
prerogatives, experience has shown her able to perform these as the
Father of the Universe and Mother Nature would have her, and still not
to be precluded from giving the profession the necessary “devotion” to
the end that it shall be “honorably filled and safely to society.” If
“the law of nature destines and qualifies the female sex ... for the
custody of the homes of the world and their maintenance in love and
honor,” as you say, Mr. Chief Justice,—we say “if” because we believe
the male sex to be joint-heir,—that does not mean that all women, or any
woman, should stay inside of four walls continually to cook, wash
dishes, sweep, dust, make beds, wash, iron, sew, etc. Oh, no! A woman
may properly act as the custodian of a home and maintain it in love and
honor, and do none of these things. Instead of such “life-long callings
of women” being “departures from the order of nature, and, when
voluntary, treason against it,” as you think, Mr. Chief Justice, we hold
that to stifle the longings of an immortal soul to follow any useful
calling in this life, to be a “departure from the order of nature, and,
when voluntary, treason against it.”
A law was promptly enacted enabling women to practice law in Wisconsin,
under which Miss Goodell was admitted to the Supreme Court of the State.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account