Women -- Employment -- United States; Women -- Social and moral questions
When the councils of the medieval church came together to decide on the
instruction needful to the young, they hastened to count women out, and
to declare them “unfit for instruction.” And they, who in defiance of
this decision—kind-hearted nuns of the Catholic Church—established
schools for girls, were publicly stoned when they were met on the
streets. The early Christian fathers denounced women as “noxious
animals,” “painted temptresses,” “necessary evils,” “desirable
calamities,” and “domestic perils.” From the English Heptarchy to the
Reformation, the law proclaimed the wife to be “in all cases, and under
all circumstances, her husband’s creature, servant, and slave.” Herbert
Spencer, writing of English laws, in his “Descriptive Sociology of
England,” says: “Our laws are based on the all-sufficiency of man’s
rights, so that society exists to-day for woman only as she is in the
keeping of some man.” To Diderot, the French philosopher, even in the
eighteenth century, so persistently do the traditions of the past make
themselves felt, woman was only a “courtesan.” To Montesquieu, she was
“an attractive child,”—to Rousseau “an object of pleasure to man.” To
Michelet, nearly a century later, she was “a natural invalid.”
This subjection of woman to man, which has hindered her development in
normal ways, has created a contemptuous opinion of her, which runs
through the literature and legislation of all nations. It is apparent
to-day in unjust laws and customs, which disgrace the statute books, and
cause society to progress with halting step. There still exist different
codes of morals for men and women, different penalties for crime, and
the relations of the sexes to the government are dissimilar. In
marriage, the husband has control of the wife’s person, and, in most
instances, ownership of her earnings, and of her minor children. She is
rarely paid the same wages as man, even when she does the same work, and
is his equal only when punishment and the payment of taxes are in
question. All these unjust inequalities are survivals of the long ages
of servitude through which woman has passed, and which have not yet
ceased to exist. During their existence, says Mme. de Staël, “woman was
able to exercise fully but one of the faculties with which nature has
gifted her—the faculty of suffering.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account