Women -- Employment -- United States; Women -- Social and moral questions
We linger over the sad story of Hypatia, whose father, Theon the
younger, was at the head of the Platonic school at Alexandria at the
close of the fourth century. He was also the commentator on Ptolemy, and
the editor of “Euclid,” adding here and there a demonstration of his
own. All that he knew he imparted to his daughter, and Hypatia occupied
a position unparalleled in ancient or modern times. Before she had
reached her twenty-seventh year she had written a book on “The
Astronomical Canon of Diophantes,” and another on “The Conics of
Apollonius.” One of her enemies, the historian Socrates, tells us that
when she succeeded her father in the Platonic school derived from
Plotinus, and “expounded the precepts of philosophy,” studious persons
from all parts of the country flocked to hear her, and that “she
addressed both them and the magistrates with singular modesty.” But
alas! she paid the penalty of her great superiority. And because she was
suspected of having “an influence in public affairs,” and was deemed
“worthy to sit in the councils of church and state,” she was brutally
murdered by a savage mob, that regarded superiority in a woman as an
arraignment of inferiority in men.
We are familiar with the story of Zenobia, Queen of Palmyra, who reigned
A.D. 267, of whom reluctant history tells us that she was a woman of
great courage, high spirit, remarkable beauty, and purity of moral
character. Her literary acquirements were unusual, and she spoke Latin,
Greek, and the Oriental languages with fluency; while in the
administration of her government she combined prudence, justice, and
liberality, so that nearly the whole of the eastern provinces submitted
to her sway.
It is a matter of history that 320 B.C., Martia, Queen of London, first
formulated the principles of the English common law in her judgments and
enactments. Her “Martian Statutes” outlived the Roman, Anglo-Saxon, and
Norse invasions. Holinshed, who is regarded as good authority, says that
Alfred the Great, after twelve hundred years, revived her Briton laws,
and enforced them among Anglo-Saxons and Danes. Two centuries later,
they were again re-enacted under Edward the Confessor, and a century
after they were again re-enacted by Stephen. The earliest laws of Great
Britain, therefore, the substance of which has been in force twenty-two
hundred years, were made by a woman.
Tacitus says of the Britons that sex was ignored in their government.
Cæsar says that women had voice in their councils, and power in their
courts, and often commanded in war. Plutarch says that women, among the
Britons, took part in deciding on war and peace, as members of the
councils, and that differences with their allies were decided by the
women.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account