Women -- Employment -- United States; Women -- Social and moral questions
The distress experienced by workers of this class wrought that great
revolution in thought which involved the education of women. This is one
of the accepted factors of the present period. At that time agitation
was rife as to what should be done for the advancement of women as
workers. Miss Virginia Penny, in a book called “Think and Act,”[175]
advocated the entrance of women into the trades and professions that
were monopolized by men. “Apprentice,” she says, “ten thousand women to
watchmakers; train ten thousand for teachers to the young; make ten
thousand good accountants; put ten thousand more to be deaconesses
trained by Florence Nightingale; put some thousands in the electric
telegraph offices all over the country; educate one thousand lecturers
for mechanics’ institutes; one thousand to read the best books to the
working-people; train up ten thousand to manage washing-machines,
sewing-machines, etc. Then the distressed needle-woman will vanish, the
decayed gentlewoman and broken-down governess cease to exist.”
Writers like Gail Hamilton in the North and Catherine Cole in the South
urged the higher education of women; their right to be educated the same
as man; “to enter the same pursuits, receive the same wages, occupy the
same posts and professions, wield the same influence, and, in a word, be
independent of man as a means of support.”
These strangely reasonable, though novel propositions, met with as much
public condemnation at the time as though, in place of being suggestions
for elevating women into skillful, rational workers, they had advocated
turning them into gamblers and drunkards. The fact was ignored that the
majority of women had always been engaged in carrying on some kind of
necessary industry, if only in untaught, helpless ways. Hence it became
fashionable to say that “woman as a worker was a product of modern
times.” Her entrance into the ranks of wealth-producers and wage-earners
was called the “New Departure,” and was deplored by writers as
calculated, by thwarting nature’s evident design in making her
child-bearer, child-trainer, and house-mother, to rob her of special
gifts of grace, beauty, and tenderness. The error of the day, it was
argued, lay in the thought that woman should be self-supporting, and she
was implored to stop and consider what homes would become,
Where woman reigns, the mother, daughter, wife,
Strews with fresh flowers the narrow way of life,
if “woman was to take her place beside man in every field of coarse,
rough toil.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account