Women -- Employment -- United States; Women -- Social and moral questions
usually a tutor for her brothers, whose instruction she was allowed to
share (the mother of Chancellor Wythe of Virginia taught her son Greek);
and there was usually, either in her own house or in the parsonage, a
large and carefully selected library of English books. If by the right
kind of family influence a girl has been thoroughly penetrated with a
love of books, something has been done for her which, of course, the
regular means of education often fail to produce. The women of New
Orleans, and Charleston, and Richmond were often cultivated women in the
best sense of the word, but of the higher education, as the modern woman
understands it, very little has hitherto existed in the Southern States.
In a long and exhaustive paper on “Colonial Education in South
Carolina,”[14] by Edward McCrady, Jr., absolutely the only mention made
of women is in the following sentences: “An education they prized beyond
all price in their leaders and teachers, and craved its possession for
their husbands and brothers and sons,” and, “These mothers gloried in
the knowledge ... of their husbands and children, and would forego
comforts and endure toil that their sons might be well instructed,
enterprising men.”[15] But in this respect South Carolina was not behind
Massachusetts. The public schools of Boston, established in 1642, were
not open to girls until 1789, and then only to teach them spelling,
reading, and composition for one half the year. The Boston High School
for girls was only opened in 1852.[16]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account