I give in Appendix C, Table I., a list of the co-educational colleges in the Southern States, prepared for me by the Bureau of Education from the manuscript statistics for 1889–90. The following so-called colleges have in no sense a proper equipment nor a proper course of study for enabling them to deserve the name of college: Eminence, Classical and Business, South Kentucky, (Ky.); Keachie, (La.); Florida Conference and St. John’s River (Fla.); Western Maryland, (Md.); Kavanagh, (Miss.); Salado, Hope, (Tex.) That leaves the following number of students who are in the collegiate departments of real, white, co-educational colleges in the South: Alabama │ 1 ────────────────────┼─── Arkansas │ 3 „ │ 22 ────────────────────┼─── District of Columbia│ 3 „ │ 25 ────────────────────┼─── Florida │ 1 „ │ 4 ────────────────────┼─── Georgia │ 30 Kentucky │ 24 Louisiana │ 77 Maryland │ 25 Mississippi │ 11 North Carolina │ 53 South Carolina │ 10 ────────────────────┼─── Tennessee │ 34 „ │ 16 „ │ 28 „ │ 10 ────────────────────┼─── Texas │ 40 „ │ 20 „ │ 70 „ │ 40 „ │175 ────────────────────┼─── West Virginia │ 32 „ │ 1 ────────────────────┴─── Texas │345 Louisiana │ 77 Other States │328 │——— Total │750 This table discloses the remarkable fact that there are 750 women studying in such men’s colleges in the South as have a decent claim to the name of college, and also that Virginia is the only State in the South that has not got at least some kind of a co-educational college.