Woman's Work in English Fiction, from the Restoration to the Mid-Victorian PeriodWhitmore, Clara Helen
History
Woman's Work in English Fiction, from the Restoration to the Mid-Victorian Period
Whitmore, Clara Helen
English fiction -- Women authors -- History and criticism; Women and literature -- Great Britain -- History
"She has struck out a path entirely her own. She has disdained to follow
the steps of her predecessors, and to construct a new novel, as is too
commonly done, out of the scraps and fragments of earlier inventors. Her
principal character, the Roman Catholic lord, is perfectly new: and she
has conducted him, through a series of surprising well-contrasted
adventures, with an uniformity of character and truth of description
that have rarely been surpassed."
There is, however, one hackneyed scene. A young girl is seized, thrust
into a chariot, and carried at full speed to a lonely place. There is
hardly an early novel where this bald incident is not worked up into one
or more chapters, with variations to suit the convenience of the plot.
It was as much a part of the stock in trade of the novelist of the
eighteenth century as a family quarrel is of the twentieth. With this
exception, _A Simple Story_ is new in its plot, incidents, characters,
and mode of treatment. Emotion did not play so important a part in a
novel again until Charlotte Brontë wrote _Jane Eyre_.
Mrs. Inchbald's only other novel, _Nature and Art_, shows the
artificialities of society. Two cousins, William and Henry, are
contrasted. William is the son of a dean. Henry's father went to Africa
to live, whence he sent his son to his rich uncle to be educated. Henry
fails to comprehend the society in which he finds himself placed, and
cannot understand that there should be any poor people.
"'Why, here is provision enough for all the people,' said Henry; 'why
should they want? why do not they go and take some of these things?'
"'They must not,' said the dean, 'unless they were their own.'
"'What, Uncle! Does no part of the earth, nor anything which the earth
produces, belong to the poor?'"
His uncle fails to answer this question to his nephew's satisfaction.
The vices and the fawning duplicity of William are contrasted with the
virtues and independent spirit of Henry.
"'I know I am called proud,' one day said William to Henry.
"'Dear Cousin,' replied Henry, 'it must be only then by those who do not
know you; for to me you appear the humblest creature in the world.'
"'Do you really think so?'
"'I am certain of it; or would you always give up your opinion to
that of persons in a superior state, however inferior in their
understanding? ... I have more pride than you, for I will never stoop
to act or to speak contrary to my feelings.'"
William rises to eminence, in time becoming a judge. Henry, who is
always virtuous, can obtain no preferment. This contrast in the two
cousins is not so overdrawn as at first appears. William represents the
aristocracy of the old world; Henry, the free representative of a new
country.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account