Civic improvement; Urban women; Women in public life
They are, if I am permitted to answer what I believe, the
old-fashioned givers, the passing of whom Dr. Devine goes on to
deplore. They are the people, too, whom Dr. Devine and _The Survey_
are waking up, who are not satisfied to go all through life having
their ideas predigested for them; more than all, they are social
workers, who have come to distrust some of the methods of social
work. Starting out with a blind faith in philanthropic methods, I
have found, time and again, not that the work was so much hampered
as some have found it, by “investigation, the keeping of records,
discriminating aid, etc.,” but that the work was not exact, and not
careful and that its faults were not mitigated by that human
sympathy which would atone for human faults.
This is not always true, but it has become proverbial, and we see
why. If we could have always with us the great people of the earth,
like Miss Addams, Miss Lathrop, Judge Mack, and others, there would
be no such proverbs as those the poor now murmur among themselves.
State aid, to my mind, is an advance, as showing the policy of the
nation, to conserve its children and its homes, and in recognizing
the mother as a factor in that campaign, for the welfare of all.[41]
Mrs. Park is a member of the Massachusetts commission on widows’
pensions which proposed legislation on the subject, not all the members
agreeing on public aid, however. The existence of this commission was
largely due to Mrs. Park but Miss Helen Winslow helped by lecturing on
the subject before more than sixty women’s clubs in Massachusetts.
All women, however, are by no means committed to the policy of public
aid for dependent mothers. Grace P. Pollard, for instance, president of
the Liberal Union of Minnesota Women, objects in these terms:
With indications that the “public” is being swayed by appeals to
protect motherhood through pensions, the presentation of “Motherhood
and Pensions” by Miss Richmond is a relief. Aside from the economic
waste of human energy which a “pension” system may induce, it is
likely to lessen individual initiative, to reduce its possible
recipients to the condition of petitioners for favors, and hence to
weaken the social structure.
It is unfortunate that our city, state and national treasuries bear
so impersonal a relation to the members of society. Intelligent
citizens know that the poor and ignorant pay an indirect tax out of
all proportion to their resources, that this condition is fostered
by those who have in hand larger resources, and that poverty and
ignorance are necessary factors in the explanation of human energy.
The poor and the ignorant are paying the price of that which is to
be returned to them as pensions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account