Civic improvement; Urban women; Women in public life
While eight women were candidates for the city council no one of
them expected to be elected, but each entered the lists to make an
educational campaign. Two of these campaigns were especially
noteworthy. Marion K. Drake led the forlorn hope in running against
the notorious alderman, “Bathhouse John” Coughlin who for over
twenty years has disgraced the first ward and city of Chicago by
exploiting the floating vote of the lodging houses. Her spirited
campaign against his character and the conditions for which he
stands was well supported by many of the most influential men and
women of the city, and resulted in doubling the vote cast against
him as compared with that of two years ago. With 7,355 men voting in
that ward, and only a few more than 3,000 women, this is a good
showing although nearly 600 more women voted for the discredited man
than for the worthy woman candidate, which is not surprising in view
of the dependence of the underworld upon its patrons.
In the great cosmopolitan tenement house family ward, surrounding
the Northwestern University Settlement, its head resident, Harriet
E. Vittum, made a most effective educational campaign. Her slogans
were “For the babies,” “For the school children,” “For the working
boys and girls,” “For men and women,” under each of which she
grouped the better home conditions and municipal policies for which
she asked votes. A house to house canvass among the foreign people,
rousing mass meetings with many men speaking for her in the foreign
languages and a children’s parade of many hundreds of little boys
and girls were some of the features of the campaign. That any woman
in such a “man’s world” as this ward has been could have secured
1,421 votes, the number next highest to that of the reëlected
alderman speaks highly for her candidacy.
In deciding the important public measures, including heavy bonded
issues, the women showed as intelligent discrimination as the men.
In proportion as these propositions were actually most dangerous or
doubtful, they were overwhelmingly defeated—notably a discredited
subway scheme, a suspicious county hospital bond issue, and some
city bond issues for purposes for which other funds are available.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account